There is an inconsistency regarding the manner in which the mitzvah of tzitzis is introduced. The term “dibur,” speak, is lashon kasheh,strong form of the verb, while “amirah,” saying, is lashon racah, the soft form. Why would the mitzvah of tzitzis be presented through two opposite expressions? Kol Yehudah explains that there are two aspects to the mitzvah of tzitzis. First, there is one who wears a four cornered garment. He must put tzitzis on the four corners of his garment. Regarding him, the Torah speaks – “You must put on tzitzis.” There is another situation which is what we…
Back to Home -> Shelach -> 5759
The final punishment was death in the wilderness. There was no reprieve, no suspension of sentence; they were simply not leaving the midbar. For every other sin, Hashem forgave them. When they rebelled with the Golden Calf, He forgave them. When they complained for no reason, Hashem forgave them. When they sinned when they followed Korach in contesting Moshe and Aharon’s leadership, Hashem forgave them. The only sin for which there was no room for forgiveness was the chet ha’meraglim, sin of the spies. They slandered; they were punished. Why? They cried that night, a weeping that was called a…
The Kotzker Rebbe, zl, explains that this was one of their sins. It is one thing to be bothered by their own lack of self-image, but why should they care what the pagans thought of them? This criticism remains with us to this very day. We are bothered by what others think of us. Why? We have a mission to accomplish in this world – to serve Hashem and be His emissaries to the world community. This position demands that we act in a manner becoming Hashem’s People. Why would we be concerned with what others think of us –…
Realistically, did the meraglim really lie? They simply recounted what they saw. If they related the truth, why were they punished? The Kotzker Rebbe, zl, explains that the fact that a statement is not a lie does not necessarily validate it as the truth. Just because one does not actually lie, he is not necessarily a man of integrity. Truth and faith emanate from the deep recesses of the heart. One does not acquire the truth by looking at it. He must conjure up courage from within to look beyond that which he sees visually. The meraglim saw a powerful…
This parsha follows immediately after the incident in the previous parsha, in which Miriam’s criticism of Moshe Rabbeinu led to her punishment. Rashi explains that the meraglim should have learned the effects of malicious gossip from Miriam. Regrettably, they did not, and they returned to Moshe with vicious slander of Eretz Yisrael. It would seem from Rashi’s explanation that the primary fault of the spies was that they neglected to take heed of what had happened to Miriam. Their error was not their disregard of the general laws of lashon hora, slanderous speech, but rather that they did not derive…
“Anashim” is not a word to indicate plain men; rather, it is a description of the men. They were distinguished men, people of stature, breeding – truly tzaddikim worthy of leading their respective tribes. What went wrong? How did tzaddikim go off the derech, correct path, virtually overnight? In fact, this is not the only instance where noble men, leaders of the Jewish People, “lost it.” In the previous parsha, we learned about the “asafsuf“, complainers, who “lusted a lust.” There is a difference of opinion in the Midrash Tanchuma as to the identity of these malcontents. One opinion is…