Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Beha'alosecha ->


“Did I conceive this entire people or did I give birth to it… where shall I get meat to give this entire people when they weep to me?” (11:12,13)

Moshe Rabbeinu seems to imply that had he conceived and given birth to the people, the question of “where shall I get meat to give the entire people,” would not be pressing. Parents are resourceful when it comes to serving their children’s needs. The amount of adrenaline which a parent has for his child is amazing! No mountain is too tall to climb, no task too difficult to perform – nothing is impossible for a parent in regard to his child. That is the way it should be. Baalei Mussar attribute this remarkable “ability” to the inherent love that Hashem…

Continue Reading

“If any man will be contaminated through a human corpse or on a distant road… he shall make the Pesach offering to Hashem.” (12:10)

The law of Pesach Sheini was inspired by a group of men who had been tamei, contaminated, by a corpse. They came forth and complained that they had not been permitted to share in the mitzvah of Korban Pesach. Chazal debate the identity of these men. Rabbi Yishmael says that they were the ones who were carrying Yosef’s coffin. Rabbi Yitzchak claims that they had become tamei as a result of tending to a “meis mitzvah,” a corpse who has no one to look after him. Rabbi Akiva opines that they were Aharon’s cousins, Mishael and Eltsafan, who had become…

Continue Reading

“When you kindle the lamps.” (8:2)

The parsha begins with the section which deals with the maintenance of the menorah. It follows immediately after the conclusion of Parashas Naso, which is concerned with the dedication of the mizbei’ach. Chazal address the juxtaposition of these two topics. They remark that upon witnessing the ceremonial activities and involvement of the nesiim in the altar’s dedication, Aharon Ha’Kohen became pained by his own and his shevet’s exclusion from them. Hashem responded to this concern by emphasizing Aharon’s unique opportunity to prepare and kindle the menorah. The Ramban notes the difficulty inherent in this statement. Aharon had the responsibility for…

Continue Reading

“And they journeyed from the Mountain of Hashem a three day distance.” (10:33)

The Midrash views this journey from the Mountain of Hashem in an uncomplimentary manner. Chazal equate Bnei Yisrael’s departure with a “child who is running away from school,” happy to leave the holy place where he received mitzvos. Inasmuch as their venture away from the Har Hashem was in accordance with Hashem’s will, Bnei Yisrael’s attitude reflected a haste that was unbecoming and inappropriate. We must endeavor to understand the analogy to a child running from school. After all, Klal Yisrael was not delinquent in their departure. Horav Elyakim Shlesinger, Shlita, gives the following insight into this analogy. Why does…

Continue Reading

“Gather to Me seventy men from the elders of Yisrael, whom you know to be the elders of the people and their officers.” (11:16)

In Sanhedrin 29, Chazal state that these men constituted the Sanhedrin. This group of elders served as the Egyptian taskmasters over the Jews. They were selected for this prestigious position because of their unparalleled devotion to Bnei Yisrael — to the point of self-sacrifice. When Pharaoh insisted that they punish Bnei Yisrael, these foremen opted to be beaten mercilessly themselves, rather than inflict punishment upon their brethren. Chazal derive from the emphasis upon this character trait that one who risks his health and welfare on behalf of Klal Yisrael merits to achieve prominence and Divine inspiration. When Pharaoh selected these…

Continue Reading

“And Moshe said to him, ‘Are you being zealous for my sake? Would that the entire people of Hashem could be prophets'” (11:29)

Two elders prophesied in the camp. When Moshe’s son, Gershom, heard the prophecies, he ran to tell his father. According to one comment in the Midrash, the prophecy predicted Moshe’s imminent death in the desert and Yehoshua’s ascension to leadership. Moshe received the news of the prophecy calmly.  Yehoshua, on the other hand, was greatly shaken by the prediction, and he asked Moshe to imprison the two prophets. Moshe’s response to his student Yehoshua reveals his greatness and underscores his brilliance as the quintessential leader of Klal Yisrael. Horav S.R. Hirsch, z.l., derives from Moshe’s perspective the necessary attitude a…

Continue Reading

“Make for you two trumpets of silver… and they shall be for you for the calling of the congregation… and when they shall blow with them they shall gather together unto you all the congregation.” (10:2,3)

Rashi explains that these trumpets were to be used only by Moshe. Moshe had been elevated to the unparalleled position of king over Am Yisrael. The trumpets were symbols of honor and prestige for him. Before he passed on, the trumpets were put away never to be used again.  In contrast, all of the other vessels created for specific use in the Mishkan, i.e. the Aron, Luchos, Shulchan, and Menorah were to be passed down from generation to generation. The Satmar Rebbe z.l. offers a profound explanation for this distinction. Everything can be bequeathed from generation to generation. The chatzotzros,…

Continue Reading

“And if you will come into war in your land against the enemy that oppresses you, then you shall blow an alarm with trumpets, and you shall be remembered before Hashem your G-d and you shall be saved from your enemies.” (10:9)

Discussing Klal Yisrael‘s entry into battle, in Parashas Ki Tzeitzei (Devarim 21:10), the  Torah does not seem to outline any specific means of aggressive attack. The Torah simply states, “When you go forth to war against your enemies, and Hashem your G-d will deliver them into your hands.” Why is there such a disparity between the two parshios dealing with waging war on the enemy? The Kotzker Rebbe z.l. distinguishes between two contrasting types of war. He suggests that the term “war” is actually an allusion to man’s constant battle with the yetzer hora, evil inclination. The differential is determined…

Continue Reading

“And he (Moshe) said leave us not… and you shall be to us instead of eyes.” (10:31)

In one interpretation of this pasuk, Rashi explains that Moshe’s request of Yisro refers to the future. His request was that the people be able to approach Yisro for enlightenment concerning any concept which they could not understand. This seems perplexing!  Considering all of the wise men and elders in Klal Yisrael, was there no one to whom the people could go for advice and instruction?  Why was Yisro’s counsel determined to be the most prudent? Horav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, suggests that Yisro’s background as a baal–teshuva rendered his advice most propitious.  One who has been nurtured from birth to…

Continue Reading

“And the mixed multitude that was among them felt a lusting and then wept again also the Bnei Yisrael and they said, “who will give us meat?” and Moshe heard the people weeping in their families… and in the eyes of Moshe it was evil.” (11:4,10)

The narrative regarding the asafsuf is vexing. As mentioned previously, Bnei Yisrael lacked no food. Chazal teach that the manna, which descended daily, had an amazing quality. Its taste varied in accordance to each person’s desire.  Indeed, each individual’s craving was satisfied. Nonetheless, Bnei Yisrael cried out for meat. Their ingratitude was magnified when they expressed their desire to return to the “wonderful” Egypt. Moshe’s response also seems atypical.  When Bnei Yisrael sinned with the Golden Calf, Moshe entreated Hashem on their behalf. He exhausted every effort to save them from complete destruction. In this situation, Moshe “gave up” in…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!