Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Yisro ->


“Now I know that Hashem is greater than all the Gods, for it was in the thing wherein they acted wickedly, (that punishment came) upon them. (18:11)

  Rashi explains that with water they thought to destroy them, and they themselves were destroyed by water. Why was Yisro worthy of having an entire parsha of the Torah named after him? What distinguished him to deserve the remarkable honor accorded him? There were men who undoubtedly were aware of Pharaoh’s terrible decree to drown the Jewish baby boys. However, it was only Yisro who was able to take two unrelated events and link them together to see their apparent relationship. He saw the punishment of “measure for measure” in Hashem’s reaction to Pharaoh’s sins. This is the distinction…

Continue Reading

“And her two sons that the name of one was Gershom, for he said I have been a stranger in a strange land, and the name of the other was Eliezer, for the G-d of my father was my salvation. And He saved me from the sword of Pharaoh.” (18:3-4)

The naming of Moshe’s two sons seemingly is not in the proper sequence. Since Moshe was first saved from Pharaoh’s sword should he have not named his son in tribute to that event before reflecting upon his being a stranger in Midyon? Rabbi Mordechai Gifter Shlita offers a response to this question. Had Moshe been saved from Pharaoh’s wrath only to assimilate in Midyon, his salvation would have been in vain. It was only after being able to withstand the adverse influences and pressures of a depraved country such as Midyon that Moshe acknowledged his salvation from the hands of…

Continue Reading

“And what are we that you complain against us.” (16:7)

Rava said, greater is that which is said regarding Moshe and Aharon, than that which is said regarding Avrohom. In Avrahom’s case it says, “I am mere dust and ashes,” while Moshe and Aharon said, “What are we?” (Chulin 89) The Talmud refers to the level of humility reached by Moshe and Aharon as opposed to Avrohom. Avrohom felt that he had some value, that of dust and ashes, while Moshe and Aharon viewed themselves as having no worth at all. Rabbi Meir Shapiro Zt”‘l explains the differences between these great leaders in relation to whom they were speaking rather…

Continue Reading

“And Miriam answered them, “Sing to Hashem, for He is highly exalted, the horse and his rider He has thrown into the sea.” (15:21)

There are some questions concerning the Shira which Miriam sang with the women immediately following the Shira which Moshe sang with the men. The posuk alludes to a question that was asked by the women, as it says: “And Miriam answered them”. What was the question? Secondly, if Miriam is responding to the women, then the Torah should have used the word “ivk” which is the female gender rather than its male counterpart “ovk”? Finally, why of the various acclamations of Hashem’s might and glory, does Miriam specifically choose the verse of “The horse and his rider he has thrown…

Continue Reading

“Then Moshe sang.” (15:1)

  Moshe said, “With the word zt I sinned, because I said since I came to Pharaoh to speak in Your Name he has dealt worse with this nation; therefore, with the word zt I will say Shira.” [Midrash] Moshe Rabeinu indicated that by beginning the Shira with the same word (zt) that he used earlier to complain to Hashem, he would atone for his previous error in judgement. This Midrash needs further explanation. How can Moshe’s error be corrected by offering praise to Hashem, simply by using the same word by which he sinned? An individual acknowledges Hashem’s favors…

Continue Reading

“And it was when Pharaoh let the people leave. (13:17)

The Talmud explains that where an episode in the Torah begins with the word “hvhu” (and it was) there is a negative implication. This seems puzzling in regard to the Exodus from Egypt; what negative aspect is there to leaving the bondage and depravity of Egypt? On the contrary, this should be a source of joy and excitement. There are various reasons given to explain the number of plagues and miracles which Hashem wrought in Egypt. One of the purposes of the plagues was to imbue in the Jewish people a strong belief in Hashem and His awesome powers, so…

Continue Reading

“And the blood shall serve as a sign on the houses in which you are.” (12:13)

Rashi explains this sign shall be for you and not for others. Hence we may derive that the blood was smeared on the inside of the house. The principal reason for smearing the blood on the inside of the threshold was for the Jew to comprehend the importance of self-sacrifice in the privacy of his home. He must concentrate on the inner dimensions of his personality. The essence of the Jewish act is not the one performed on the public stage, but the one performed on the inner stage, when the audience is only Hashem. The only audience to which…

Continue Reading

“And Moshe replied, we will go with our young and old alike.” (10:9)

Why does Moshe mention the young before the old? Should not the elders go before the young? The Kesav Sofer responds that the young had to be rescued as soon as possible. Since they lacked a proper spiritual upbringing, they were more susceptible than their elders to the Egyptian environment. Only after the youth had left, did the older generation, who still maintained some roots in Judaism, and were more likely to survive spiritually in Egypt, leave. The Koznitzer Magid Zt”l applies a homiletical exposition to this posuk. As we go in our youth, we will ultimately go in our…

Continue Reading

“And in order that you relate in the ears of your son and your son’s son that which I have wrought in Egypt and my signs which I have done among them.” (10:2)

Things were witnessed in Egypt that people would talk about for generations. Indeed, in all future encounters nations feared Israel’s potential power because of what transpired in Egypt, yet the Torah tells us that these miraculous occurrences should be told into the ears of our children. If history will proclaim these awesome miracles, why should we then whisper them into the ears of our children? The Torah is teaching us an important lesson. The message of Jewish history depends upon its interpretation. Records of various historical events mean very little. Throughout the annals of Jewish history various miraculous events have…

Continue Reading

“And in order that you relate in the ears of your son and your son’s son… so that you may perceive that I am Hashem.” (10:2)

The Torah explicitly states the purpose of the Exodus from Egypt. The entire purpose was the transmittal of this event to future generations. Since the Exodus, divine revelation, and the giving of the Torah are the foundation of our belief, it is mandatory that we relate these events to future generations. Relating these events to the next generation, gives them the opportunity to identify with the previous generation, thereby establishing another link in the chain of our national heritage. Why the necessity to relate this to our children and our children’s children? If every father is obliged to teach his…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!