We are admonished to retain focus on Torah study, lest we forget any part of it. It is not easy to remember everything that we learn. After all, we are only human, so we forget. A chasid once came before the Chidushei Ha’rim with such a complaint. How was he to be expected to remember everything that he had learned? The Rebbe responded, “Tell me, my dear friend, did you ever forget to do something that your life depended on, such as eating or sleeping?” The chasid responded emphatically, “Of course not!” The Rebbe countered, ” Eating and sleeping are…
Back to Home -> Va'eschanan ->
In the Talmud Kiddushin 30A Chazal infer from this pasuk’s command to teach Torah to one’s grandchildren that one who does so is considered as if he received the Torah from Har Sinai. This is derived from the juxtaposition of the revelation at Har Sinai to the mitzvah of talmud Torah. In a lecture in Hilchos chinuch, Horav Reuven Grosovsky, zl, explains that one who teaches Torah becomes a shaliach, agent, of Hashem to transmit Torah to future generations. He parallels Moshe Rabbeinu, the quintessential teacher and lawgiver, who transmitted the Torah to Bnei Yisrael. This unique relationship gives rise…
Moshe was not permitted to enter into Eretz Yisrael regardless of the sincerity of his abundant prayers. It just was not to be. The Midrash adds a profound insight into Hashem’s refusal to sanction Moshe’s request to enter Eretz Yisrael. Rabbi Levi comments, “Moshe Rabbeinu said to Hashem; Ribbono Shel Olam the bones of Yosef Ha’tzaddik shall enter Eretz Yisrael (for burial) and I shall not?’” Hashem responded, “He who acknowledged his land merits to be buried there; he who did not acknowledge his land is not buried there.” When Yosef was falsely accused of making advances to the…
The commentators suggest a number of reasons that Eisav suddenly decided to separate from Yaakov. Some of them posit that pure greed motivated this decision. He felt the land could not support him in the style to which he had become accustomed. Horav S.R. Hirsch, zl, contends that Eisav’s decision was a pragmatic one; he could not tolerate Yaakov’s presence. Despite their newfound relationship, the moral gulf that existed between them was loathsome for Eisav. He simply could not cope with his brother’s lifestyle. These various explanations notwithstanding, we still must address the reason that Eisav left. Why could he…
One would think that when Yaakov assigned a name to a place, he would use a reason more meaningful than the fact that it had served as a shelter for livestock. The Ohr Ha’Chaim suggests that this was probably the first time anyone had cared for animals to the point that shelter was provided for them. This public display of compassion for animals was viewed as sufficient reason for naming the place Succos. Hence, people would take note and themselves show concern for animals. Horav Simcha Zissel Broide, Shlita, takes a novel approach towards understanding Yaakov’s reasoning. The pasuk states…
Rashi attributes the name given by the Torah to the sciatic nerve, Gid Hanashe, to the fact that the nerve was “nash’e,” “jumped” out of its place. When the angel struck Yaakov, he dislocated the sciatic nerve. Accordingly, the word nashe is defined as being removed from its original or usual place. Another meaning can be applied to the word “nash’e,” which sheds light upon the actual damage that resulted when the angel struck Yaakov. Horav Avigdor Tzvi Nebentzhal, Shlita, cites the pasuk in Parashas Mikeitz (Bereishis 41:51) in which Yosef, upon naming his son Menashe, says, ki nashani elokim…
The Zohar Ha’Kadosh interprets the “kaf yerech” as “tamchin do’oraisa,” referring to those who support Torah. The Chafetz Chaim explains that Eisav’s angel disputed Yaakov’s claim to the blessings, offering the argument that Eisav had as much right to the blessings as Yaakov did. Yaakov retorted that his descendants would one day receive the Torah to study. Although Eisav’s angel could not impugn this rationale, he nevertheless attempted to hurt Yaakov. He succeeded in weakening the financial support for Torah. In the “Ikvasa d’Meshicha,” the period of time close to the advent of Moshiach, Torah supporters will seek excuses to…
We may note that the concept of viddui, confession of guilt, is expressed almost exclusively in the reflexive form: “vsu,vu.” Horav S.R. Hirsch, zl, explains that Hashem does not need our confession; He has no need for us to notify Him of our guilt. Confession is for the sinner; he must acknowledge his guilt–to himself. The first step towards penance, the initial step of contrition, is hakoras ha’cheit, recognizing that one has sinned–and accepting in earnest the error of his deeds. One cannot begin to think about offering a sacrifice for guilt until he has personally acknowledged his guilt–to himself….
The Torah begins the laws of the Korban Minchah, meal-offering. While the Torah lists five varieties of voluntary, personal meal-offerings, they all consist of the same basic ingredients: finely ground wheat flour, oil, and frankincense. Horav S.R. Hirsch, zl, infers from the word “minchah,” which in the Hebrew language means “gift” or “tribute,” that the meal-offering proclaims the owner’s acknowledgment that his life and all he has is a gift from the Almighty. Grain, a staple of the human diet, represents our very existence. Oil symbolizes comfort, and the frankincense alludes to joy, both gifts from Hashem. We have only…
The third Sefer of the five Chumashim opens with a summons to Moshe. Interestingly, the word trehu —Vayikra–“He called” is spelled with a small aleph at the end of the word. The commentators all express their insights into this deviation from the norm. We suggest the following reason for the small aleph, especially in light of its position at the beginning of Sefer Vayikra, which deals with sacrifices. The Midrash in the beginning of Vayikra minimizes our obligations as Jews. Chazal relate: Hashem says to Klal Yisrael, “I have given you ten pure animals which you may enjoy. Three of…