Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Bereishis ->


This is the book (account) of the descendants of Adam. (5:1)

The Torah enumerates the generations that descended from Adam Ha’Rishon.   In his inimitable manner, Horav Moshe Swift, zl, suggests a homiletic interpretation of this pasuk.  “The book of life is the generations of man.”  There are all kinds of books. Some are worth reading, while others  are nothing more than trash.  Some books teach valuable lessons with profound meaning, while other books leave no lasting impression.  We are pages in the book of life written by our parents.  They are the cover, the binding that holds the pages together.  We write the pages based upon the way that we act…

Continue Reading

And Hashem Elokim called to the man, and said unto him, ‘Where are you?’” (3:8)

It seems strange that Hashem, Who knows everything, asked Adam, “Where are you?”  Obviously, Hashem knew where Adam was.  The Midrash tells us that Hashem certainly knew where Adam was; He just wanted to talk to him, to engage him in conversation.  Hashem wanted to interact  with Adam, to get him to open up and talk about the act that he had committed.  Horav Moshe Swift, zl, offers a thoughtful insight.  Whenever one senses a rift in a relationship, he should maintain contact in order to sustain  hope of reconciliation.  The tragedy is when there is no contact. When a…

Continue Reading

And dust shall you eat all the days of your life. (3:14)

What to some individuals may be perceived as a curse could actually be a blessing in disguise —  and vice versa.  The serpent was cursed with having to eat tasteless dust his whole life.  Imagine being relegated to a life in which one’s entire sustenance is without any taste.  A life of no satisfaction, no pleasure, is truly a curse.  But is it?  While the serpent’s food is  not  appealing, it is always available.  He  never has to worry about the source of  his next meal.   We have only to ask someone who struggles to earn a livelihood how…

Continue Reading

And Adam named his wife Chavah, because she was the mother of all living. (3:20)

Adam and Chavah, the first humans, serve as an example.  From the perspective of marriage, as well as human relationship in general, they represent a living lesson in the manner in which one interrelates with others.  Horav Zalman Sorotzkin, zl, infers a compelling lesson from Adam’s reaction to Chava’s sin. According to some commentaries, Adam gave Chavah her name, a name emphasizing her positive contribution to humanity and prime focus in life–“the mother of all living,” after she had catalyzed his sin.   Chavah caused Hashem to decree death on the world.  Yet, Adam did not turn his back on…

Continue Reading

And Kayin brought an offering….to Hashem…and as for Hevel, he also brought (an offering). (4:3,4)

The average student of Chumash perceives the first two brothers as  paradigms of good and evil.  The Torah presents Kayin  as a rasha, evil person, and Hevel  as a tzaddik, righteous man.  Is that really true?  The Torah emphasizes that “Hevel also brought (a korban).”  This implies  that he was merely emulating his brother’s actions.  Does that earn him a virtuous reputation?  We may also question why Hashem caused Hevel to die childless.  We have no remembrance of Hevel, just as nothing remains of Kayin, whose descendants all died in the Flood.  The world was propagated from Sheis, their brother. …

Continue Reading

And Kayin said to Hevel his brother. (4:6)

We have  no record of that conversation.  We have no idea what they spoke about and what catalyzed the first murder.  Targum Yonasan records a lengthy theological debate between Kayin and Hevel. Kayin offered strong criticism of Hevel’s way of life and of his belief in the Almighty.  It went so far that Kayin exclaimed, “Les din v’les Dayan,” “There is no law and there is no Judge.”  He rejected the Ribbono Shel Olam!  The question that begs elucidation is simple:  Why was Kayin so jealous of Hevel’s communion with some non-existent Deity?  If Kayin believed in nothing, then he…

Continue Reading

“And Hashem said, ‘Let the earth cover itself with vegetation, plants that reproduce through seeds, fruit trees that are fruit…'” (1:11)

Rashi comments that Hashem had planned that the tree would have the same taste as the fruit. The earth disobeyed, generating trees that bore fruit, but which were not themselves fruit. Consequently, Hashem punished the earth together with man. The commentators explain that prior to the time that natural law was definitely established, Hashem had granted the earth an element of “creative” freedom. In addition, as the Rambam states in Hilchos Yesodei Ha’Torah, the various parts of creation have a living soul and consciousness of their own existence.             Horav Eli Munk, zl, cites the Chizkuni, who offers the earth’s…

Continue Reading

“And Hashem said, ‘Let us make man.'” (1:26)

Shlomo Ha’Melech teaches us in Koheles 12:13, “When all is said and done, fear Hashem,… for that is the sum of man.” This is a remarkable statement! One who does not fear Heaven is an animal! Is the fear of G-d the true determining factor in one’s humanness? Perhaps it is a component in his physical makeup, but is it not bold to say that this is the primary, the sole factor, in his characterization as a human being?             Horav Elchanan Wasserman, zl, claims that, indeed, one’s humanness is in direct proportion to his fear of G-d. The more…

Continue Reading

“And Hashem said, “Let us make man in our own image, after our likeness.'” (1:26)

This pasuk has been the source of abundant commentary. The plural form, “us,” seems to imply that Hashem consulted with others. Did the Almighty need assistance in order to create man? Chazal teach us that when Moshe wrote the Torah, he came to this pasuk and noticed the plural word “us.” He asked Hashem, “Master, why give heretics the opportunity to claim that there is more than one G-d?” Hashem responded, “Write! And whoever wants to err will err. Write, for if a great man ever says, ‘Why should I consult with others?’ they will tell him, ‘Learn from the…

Continue Reading

“And, Hashem, Elokim, formed the man of dust from the ground.” (2:7)

Chazal call attention to the fact that the word rmhhu is spelled with a double “yud”. They infer from this exceptional case the dual nature of man. Two yetziros, creations, came into being. Man is a composite of mortal and immortal, earthly and heavenly, the yetzer tov, the good inclination, and the yetzer hora, its evil counterpart. He is created for Olam Ha’zeh, this temporal world, and Olam Ha’bah, the Eternal world. Horav S.R. Hirsch, zl, notes that while there are two “yudin,” only one “yud” is enunciated. One yetzira is audible while the other is quiescent. One is predominant,…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!