Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

  • Reset

Home -> Chukas -> Uncategorized

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Uncategorized, Chukas, 5762

“And speak to the rock.” (20:8)

Horav Leib Eiger, z.l., related that when he was a young boy studying with his grandfather, Horav Akiva Eiger, z.l., the  Nesivos, Horav Yaakov, z.l., m’Lissa, once came to visit. It so happened that the Chasam Sofer, z.l., Rav Akiva Eiger’s son-in-law, was also visiting at the time. Rav Akiva Eiger was overjoyed with his distinguished guests. Thus, he asked his rebbetzin to prepare a suitable meal for them. He asked a student from the yeshivah to serve the guests. During the meal, Rav Akiva Eiger asked the Nesivos to honor them with a discourse in Halachah. Rav Yaakov lectured impressively…

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Chukas

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Chukas, 5762

“Miriam died there, and she was buried there. There was no water for the assembly.” (20:1-2)

The Kli Yakar explains that there is a distinct connection between Miriam’s death and Klal Yisrael’s lack of water. The Torah does not record that the assembly wept at Miriam’s death, as they did for Moshe Rabbeinu and Aharon. She was not eulogized properly, because they did not appreciate what they had received due to her merit. They knew that Moshe was the intermediary through which they received the Torah from Hashem. Aharon engendered harmony and unity among the people. Miriam had “long ago” helped save Jewish infants in Egypt, but no one remembered, it was “ancient history.” Therefore, Hashem dried…

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Korach

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Korach, 5762

“And it (the earth) swallowed them and their households, and all the people who were with Korach.” (16:32)

Korach’s sons repented at the very last moment, so they did not die. They were originally involved in the dispute, but they later saw the  light. Korach, however, was  too  embroiled,  too  involved in himself, to be saved. He went down in infamy. Yet, I think there is something to be derived from this thought: Korach could not have been all that bad. Apparently, if his children repented, then there had to have been a value system at home that was spiritually correct. They had to have been raised correctly. Horav Avigdor HaLevi Nebentzhal, Shlita, cites the Arizal, who takes the…

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Korach

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Korach, 5762

“They stood/arose before Moshe.” (16:2)

Targum Yonasan adds, V’kamu b’chutzpah, “They arose with insolence.” How does the pasuk imply that they acted with  chutzpah, impudence, towards Moshe Rabbeinu? On the contrary, the pasuk clearly states that they arose for him. Maharitz gives a pragmatic explanation, one that teaches us a profound lesson of the definition of chutzpah. He explains that knowing that Moshe was coming, they arose before he came, so that they would not have to get up for him. They refused to demonstrate any derech eretz, respect, for Moshe, so they were already standing when Moshe came. This is considered standing up with chutzpah….

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Korach

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Korach, 5762

“And On ben Peles.” (16:1)

The Midrash teaches us that On ben Peles was saved as a result of listening to his wife. She asked him, “What do you gain by being involved  in  this  dispute?  Regardless  of  who  triumphs,  you still emerge as the loser. If Aharon is selected as Kohen Gadol – you will be his student. If Korach becomes the Kohen Gadol – you are still nothing more than a student. Why involve yourself in a ‘no win’ situation?” On’s wife spoke with seichel, common sense. Is this a reason to praise her? Basically, she only did what any level-headed person would do….

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Korach

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Korach, 5762

“Korach took/separated himself.” (16:1)

What caused Korach, a distinguished leader in Klal Yisrael, to alienate himself to the degree that he fell to such a nadir of iniquity?  The  Bais  Yisrael  comments  that  these  two words, Vayikach Korach, “Korach took,” says it all. Korach’s approach to life was defined by “taking.” It was his goal; it was his raison d’etre. He took in gashmiyus, materialism, becoming one of Klal Yisrael’s wealthiest men. He also wanted to take in ruchniyus, spirituality. He was an oveid Hashem, one who serves Hashem, with great diligence. Among the carriers of the Aron Ha’kodesh, he represented the spiritual elite of…

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Shelach

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Shelach, 5762

“And you shall not go astray after your heart and after your eyes.” (15:39)

In the Talmud Berachos 12b, Chazal interpret the meaning of “straying after one’s heart and eyes.” “Straying after the heart” is a reference to entertaining heretical thoughts, and “straying after the eyes” alludes  to permitting lewd thoughts to enter one’s mind. The Torah enjoins us to distance ourselves from places or situations which will inspire such sinful contemplations. We are provided with the mitzvah of Tzitzis as a reminder of our obligation to exercise care in avoiding these spiritual hazards. The Talmud Gittin 55b relates the story of Kamtza and Bar Kamtza, two people in Yerushalayim with very similar names….

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Shelach

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Shelach, 5762

“They brought forth an evil report on the land that they had spied… ‘it is a land that devours its inhabitants…we were like grasshoppers in our eyes, and so we were in their eyes.’” (13:32-33)

The spies returned from their mission and spread malicious  lies about Eretz Yisrael. They said the land was made for huge and robust people, not for ordinary people like the Jews. They failed to realize that they were the beneficiaries of Hashem’s favor. Wherever they went, they noticed funerals going on. Rather than realize that Hashem was sparing them by engaging the Canaanites in funeral preparations, they were quick to charge that it was a land that devours its inhabitants. They felt especially insignificant in the eyes of the giants that lived there. This statement was especially slanderous and pure conjecture….

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Shelach

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Shelach, 5762

“And how is the land – is it fertile or is it lean? Are there trees in it or not?” (13:20)

Rashi comments that Moshe’s reference to a tree is an allusion to a tzaddik, righteous person. He was teaching the meraglim, spies,  that if a righteous person was living in the land, he would protect its inhabitants from attack through his merit. In his Sefer Simchas HaTorah, Horav Simcha HaKohen Sheps, z.l., supplements Rashi with another reason for comparing an adam kasher to a tree. In addition to the shade which a tree provides and the fruit which it produces, a tree has a cleansing effect on the ecology. A tree purifies the air by its very existence. It balances the…

Continue Reading

Home -> 5762 -> Beha'alosecha

Rabbi L. Scheinbaum
In Beha'alosecha, 5762

“He named that place Kivros-Hataavah (the graves of lust) because there they buried the people who had been craving.” (11:34)

Immediately after the people were punished for their needless complaining, they started right up again with a new set of complaints and  accusations.  This  time  they  slandered  the  manna,  which  they received daily from Hashem. They claimed they wanted meat – although there was no shortage of meat. They talked about how wonderful Egypt was – in comparison to their misery in the desert. After all was said and done, it amounted to nothing more than an uncontrolled craving. They were overpowered by their yetzer hara, evil inclination. The middah of taavah, craving/lusting for something, can overwhelm a person, so that he…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!