Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Category

Back to Home -> Pinchas ->


The name of the slain Yisrael man who was slain with the Midyanites was Zimri ben Salu, leader of a father’s house of the Shimoni. (25:14)

Interestingly, in the previous parsha, when the Torah narrates the actual episode and Zimri’s flagrant act of licentiousness, it does not mention the identity of the perpetrators. Only now — after Pinchas acted and Zimri has been executed — is the  identity of Zimri publicized.  Why is this?  Why is it that after Zimri has been slain, and Pinchas has received his reward,  the Torah reveals  who Pinchas killed?  Rashi seems to address this question by saying  that when the Torah records the name of the tzaddik, Pinchas, for praise, it also mentions the name of the evil perpetrator —…

Continue Reading

He was jealous for My sake among them. (25:11)

Pinchas’ act of zealousness was pure, motivated by his desire to avenge the desecration of Hashem’s Name.  He executed his deed, unaware of the identity of his victims or who witnessed   his zealous act.  He  focused only on one thing – to put an end to the public humiliation of Hashem and His leadership.  What gave Pinchas the courage to act in this manner?  While his intentions were certainly noble, only  a uniquely inspired person can achieve what Pinchas did.  What is the source of that inspiration? In a departure from the usual interpretation of the word, “b’socham,” “among…

Continue Reading

And it shall be for him and his offspring after him a covenant of eternal Priesthood. (25:13)

In the Talmud Zevachim 101a, Chazal tell us that Pinchas did not become a Kohen, member of the Priesthood, until he killed Zimri. Hashem gave the Kehunah only  to Aharon  and his sons, who were anointed at the same time.  The offspring to be born to these sons after the anointing would be Kohanim.  Pinchas, who was neither anointed nor born afterwards, was therefore not included in the Kehunah.  This Chazal raises a number of questions.  First, why was Pinchas not anointed?  Second, when Pinchas became a Kohen, his kedushah – sanctity – was unique.  It was not kedushas Aharon;…

Continue Reading

May Hashem… appoint a man over the assembly. Who shall go out before them and come in before them who shall take them out and who shall bring them in. (27:16,17)

The Jewish leader must possess the following  two qualities:  He must be strong, ready  to lead his people into battle —  not cowering  in the rear lines.  He must also take a stand on Jewish issues, even if his position is not a popular one.  When he sees the people veering from daas Torah, the perspective of Torah for our lives, then he must protest vehemently. He must  do everything within his power to prevent their deviation. He must go “lifneihem,” before them, he must lead – not be led.  He must do what is right,  even if the people…

Continue Reading

And one male of the goats for a sin-offering to Hashem. (28:15)

It is interesting to note that the word chatas, sin-offering, is followed by,  “l’Hashem,” to Hashem, a term  which is not used anywhere else in the Torah.  The he-goats of the Korban Mussaf were brought to atone for sins involving tumah, ritual contamination. When an individual  was tamei he either entered the Bais Hamikdash or ate kodoshim, sacrificial meat to offer his sacrifice.  Rashi explains that the addition of the word “l’Hashem”  indicates the extent of error on the part of the tamei person.  He was unaware either before or afterwards that he was tamei. Only Hashem knew of the…

Continue Reading

And let the assembly of Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd. (27:17)

Moshe pleads with Hashem to name his successor who would lead Bnei Yisrael.  In closing,  he entreats Hashem not to permit Bnei Yisrael to be left without  leadership.  One would think that in the desert the Jewish People  were bereft of competent leadership.  True, Moshe would be gone,  but he left behind him those who learned leadership skills directly from him: Yehoshua, his student par excellence;  Pinchas,  the zealot who had the courage to stand up to a nasi who had publicly desecrated Hashem’s Name; Elazar,  the son of Aharon HaKohen, the Kohen Gadol who was the paradigm of sanctity; …

Continue Reading

Pinchas ben Elazar ben Aharon Ha’kohen turned back My wrath from upon the Bnei Yisrael. (25:11)

Upon consideration, did Pinchas really have to act in such a drastic manner?  He is lauded for avenging the honor of Hashem. Was there no other way to prevent Zimri from performing his reprehensible act of rebellion against Hashem?  Could  Pinchas not have chosen a less “final” — and perhaps  more conciliatory — solution for the “Zimri” problem?  This is the type of question that plagues those who do not quite understand the meaning of the term “kanai,” zealot.  Pinchas was not a reactionary  who unleashed his uncontrollable anger, killing innocent people.  He was not a religious maniac whose lack…

Continue Reading

Pinchas ben Elazar ben Aharon Ha’kohen turned back My wrath from upon the Bnei Yisrael when he zealously avenged Me among them…Behold! I give him My covenant of Peace…And it shall be for him and his offspring after him a covenant of eternal priesthood. (25: 11,12, 13)

Pinchas receives the ultimate reward–Kehunas olam–eternal priesthood.  This blessing of everlasting priesthood was not bestowed upon anyone else.  It was not bestowed neither upon  Moshe the lawgiver, nor Aharon the Kohen, who was the paradigmatic peacemaker.  Horav Moshe Swift, zl, notes that the blessing of continuity, the concept of uninterrupted service to Hashem, was neither a product of  the service in the Mikdash  nor  the teaching in the Bais Ha’midrash.  While these contribute to future development,  they do not actually forge the links in the chain of continuity.  They do not create a “lo ul’zaro acharav” for him and his…

Continue Reading

He was zealous for My sake in their midst…Because he was zealous for his G-d and made atonement for the Bnei Yisrael. (25:11,13)

What is the significance of the fact that Pinchas performed his act of zealousness “in their midst”?  Sforno comments that Pinchas avenged Hashem’s honor in the sight of all. Although they had originally seen Zimri’s despicable act, and they did not protest, they could find atonement for not protesting against Pinchas.  What Sforno is saying is that the masses were guilty of apathy.  They witnessed blatant acts of harlotry and idolatry, yet they  failed to object or to  intervene.  Their atonement would now be attained by permitting Pinchas to publicly carry out his act of zealousness.  Sforno teaches us that…

Continue Reading

Yocheved, daughter of Levi, who was born to Levi in Egypt. (26:59)

Yocheved was counted among the original seventy souls that accompanied Yaakov Avinu as he went down to Egypt.  Horav Eli Munk, zl, in his commentary Kol Ha’torah, notes that Yocheved was  placed at the core of this genealogy.  He attributes this honor to her exceptional destiny.  She married her nephew, Amram, a union that was legitimate only because the Torah had not yet been given.  When Pharaoh decreed that all new-born Jewish boys be put to death, her husband divorced her.  At the time, she was three months pregnant with Moshe.  Her daughter Miriam,  inspired by Ruach Ha’kodesh, convinced her…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!