Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Noach ->


“Noach was a righteous man, perfect in his generations.” (6:9)

Chazal offer a number of interpretations for the phrase “in his generations.” Some commentators interpret this as praise for Noach, who was able to transcend the evil even of his generation. Indeed, had he lived in a generation in which righteousness was the way of life, he would have been even greater. Others contend that he could stand out only in his own generation, in which evil was the standard. Horav Shlomo Margolis, Shlita, feels that “b’dorosov,” “in his generations,” reflects the limited effect of Noach’s righteousness – it lasted only during his generations. He was not able to inspire…

Continue Reading

“And Cham being the father of Canaan.” (9:18)

It would have been sufficient to say, “And Cham was the father of Canaan.” Why does the Torah emphasize “hu” – “he,” as if there were something unique to be derived from the fact that Cham was Canaan’s father. Horav Sholom Schwadron, z.l., attributes Canaan’s inappropriate behavior to the way he was raised by Cham, his father. Indeed, the apple did not fall far from the tree. Cham – he – is the father of Canaan. He is responsible for the way Canaan acted. The son inherited his father’s genes, his base nature, his contemptible character, his repulsive behavior. Cham…

Continue Reading

“Noach, the man of the earth, debased himself and planted a vineyard. He drank of the wine and became drunk.” (9:20-21)

In the Midrash, Chazal comment regarding the word “vayochel,” which is related to “chullin” – “Nischalel v’naaseh chullin,” “he desecrated  himself  and  became  unholy.”  Why?  Because he planted a vineyard. He should have planted something else. We infer from Chazal that the actual planting of the vineyard was in itself a deficiency in Noach’s spiritual stature. His drunken stupor was the result of this deficiency, an offshoot of his previous error – planting the vineyard. We must endeavor to understand the severity of this “sin.” Wine can be–and is–used also for a more lofty purpose. Chazal say: “Ein simcha b’lo…

Continue Reading

“And Shem lived five hundred years after begetting Arpachshad, and he begot sons and daughters.” (11:11)

Interestingly, in recounting the ten generations from Adam until Noach, the Torah writes the word, “va’yamos”, “and he died,” after each person that is mentioned. Upon mentioning the ten generations from Noach until Avraham however, the Torah uses the word, “ve’yechi,” and he lived,” referring to how long the individual lived. Why does the Torah make this distinction between the generations? Horav Yaakov Moshe Charlap, z.l., cites the Mishnah in Pirkei Avos 5:2, wherein it is stated: “There were ten generations from Adam to Noach which informs (us) how great is His (Hashem’s) patience, for all these generations continued to…

Continue Reading

Noach was a righteous man…Noach walked with Hashem. (6:9)

  Noach walked with Hashem.  This seems to be a positive comment about Noach’s virtue, until we note that the Torah writes about Avraham Avinu, “Hashem before  whom I walked,” (Bereishis 24:40).  Rashi notes that Avraham walked in front, without assistance.  Noach walked with Hashem; he needed the support of the Almighty to maintain his spiritual strength.  Without prompting from Above, Noach would have faltered.  Avraham, on the other hand, had the spiritual fortitude to single-handedly override the challenges that confronted him.  Chazal use the term, “hisorrerus d’l’eila,” inspired from Above, in reference to Noach’s spiritual commitment.  In contrast, Avraham…

Continue Reading

Hashem said to Noach, “The end of all flesh has come before Me, for the earth is filled with robbery through them.” (6:13)

The people had become overtly corrupt.  At first  they committed immorality and idolatry.  Then their sinning “progressed” to blatant robbery.  Their covert sins led to overt corruption, for which Hashem would not forgive them.  Rashi cites Chazal, who say that, indeed, Hashem did not seal their verdict  until they began stealing  from one  another.  This is enigmatic.  Is stealing more sinful than immorality, idolatry and murder? Horav Dov Eliezrov, zl, explains that while stealing is certainly not as evil as the three cardinal sins of immorality, murder and idolatry, it is, however, the bitter root of evil.  It indicates the…

Continue Reading

Cham, the father of Canaan, saw his father’s nakedness and told his two brothers outside. (9:22)

Noach’s other two sons, Shem and Yafes, remained outside the tent out of respect for their father.  They had no desire to take part in their father’s degradation.  Not so Cham, who boldly entered the tent and emerged later to relate the scene that he had witnessed.  Pirkei D’Rabbi Eliezer comments on the depravity of Cham.  He himself was a father who should have set an example for his own children.  He should have felt different about debasing his father,  knowing fully well the impression this would leave on his own children.  No, he took pleasure in observing and relating…

Continue Reading

They said, “Come, let us build a city for ourselves and a tower whose top will be in the heavens, and we will make a name for ourselves. (11:4)

“We will make a name for ourselves” is the attitude one would expect from an individual with an  insecure ego.  Horav S.R. Hirsch, zl, remarks that becoming aware of one’s ego can lead to two possible attitudes:  humility or arrogance.  An obsession with one’s insignificance can either stimulate one to do something for the common good, to serve humanity, or it can drive him to defy what he believes is an inexorable destiny, to break the shackles of human limitations by revolting against Hashem.  The people of that generation chose arrogance.  They could not accept the fact that one’s worth,…

Continue Reading

Now these are the chronicles of Terach, Terach begot Avram, Nachor and Haran…Haran died in the lifetime of Terach his father. (11:27,28)

The Torah traces the genealogy of Avraham Avinu.  It records the names of his two brothers, Nachor and Haran, and adds that Haran died during his father Terach’s lifetime.  Rashi cites the Midrash that claims that Haran actually died because of his father.  Terach was an idol merchant who complained to the wicked Nimrod that his son,  Avraham,  had smashed his wares.  Nimrod could not tolerate that someone “defaced” his idols, so he threw Avraham into a fiery furnace.  Haran was challenged to decide between his brother and his king.  Should he follow Avraham, whose belief in monotheism made sense?…

Continue Reading

May Hashem extend Yafes, but he will dwell in the tents of Shem. (9:27)

Horav Shabsai Yudelewitz, Shlita, tells a story which serves as an analogy demonstrating the message of this pasuk.  There was once a wealthy man whose daughter had reached marriageable age.  Alas, all the father’s money could do very little to compensate for her physical appearance which was, at best, homely.  The shadchanim had given up hope of finding a suitable husband for this hapless girl.  Suddenly, an idea dawned upon the father.  He would look for a talmid chacham, a yarei Shomayim, a G-d-fearing ben Torah, who was devoted to Torah study. This individual would see beyond the physical and…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!