Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Mishpatim ->


כל אלמנה ויתום לא תענון

You shall not cause any pain to any widow or orphan. (22:21)

It takes a truly reprehensible person to take advantage of a widow or orphan. These are individuals who are alone against the world. Why make life even more difficult for them? At first glance, we may even wonder why the admonishment against afflicting the almanah, widow, or yasom, orphan, is even included with the many laws that are mentioned in this parsha. Quite possibly, Hashem wants to put everyone on notice: He takes a special interest in the plight of these lonely people. He will listen to their pleas when they cry out to Him in pain. Anyone who causes…

Continue Reading

וגר לא תלחץ ואתם ידעתם את נפש הגר... ושש שנים תזרע את ארצך... והשביעית תשמטנה

Do not oppress a stranger; you know the feelings of a stranger… six years shall you sow your land… and in the seventh, you shall leave it unattended and unharvested. (23:9,10,11)

The juxtaposition of the laws of Shemittah upon the admonishment not to treat the ger, convert, in a lesser manner than we would treat anyone else is enigmatic. What relationship exists between these two seemingly disparate mitzvos? Furthermore, how is the admonishment concerning the proper treatment of the ger linked to the fact that we were strangers in the Land of Egypt? Had we not once been Egyptian slaves would it in any way diminish the responsibility to act appropriately with the ger? Horav Avigdor HaLevi Nebentzhal, Shlita, quotes Rashi, who explains, “For you were strangers in the land of…

Continue Reading

ושש שנים תזרע את ארצך... והשביעית תשמטנה ונטשתה. ששת ימים תעשה מעשך וביום השביעי תשבת

And six years you shall sow your land… but the seventh year you should let it rest and life fallow… six days you should do your work, but on the seventh day you should rest. (23:10,11,12)

The Torah juxtaposes the laws of Shemittah, the Sabbatical year, upon the weekly Shabbos, simply because both attest to the handiwork of the Creator which took place during the Six Days of Creation. Following these “working” days, Hashem rested, which was the first Shabbos. This seventh day of rest is commemorated both weekly on Shabbos and every seven years, in the form of Shemittah. In his Pri Tzaddik, Horav Tzadok HaKohen, zl, cites the Mechilta 20, that tells us that the Torah cautions us not to neglect the weekly Shabbos during the Shemittah year. This statement begs elucidation. Why would…

Continue Reading

כי תקנה עבד עברי שש שנים יעבד ובשבעת יצא לחפשי

If you purchase a Jewish bondsman, he shall work for six years; and in the seventh he shall go free. (21:2)

The term mishpatim, ordinances, aptly describes the core of the parsha: to list many of the social ordinances found in the Torah. It is, therefore, interesting to note that the first law detailed in the parsha is that of the eved Ivri, Hebrew slave. The terminology the Torah uses to describe the slave’s nationality and religious affiliation is inconsistent with the manner it uses throughout the rest of the Torah, in which Jews are referred to as Yisrael – not Ivri. The Shem MiShmuel quotes his father, the Avnei Nezer, who is bothered by this question. In order to answer…

Continue Reading

אם חבל תחבל שמלת רעך עד בא השמש תשיבנו לו. כי היא כסותה לבדה הוא שמלותו לערו במה ישכב והיה כי יצעק אלי ושמעתי כי חנון אני

If you take your fellow’s garment as security, until sunset shall you return it to him. For it alone is his clothing, it is his garment for his skin – in what should he lie down? So it will be that if he cries out to Me, I shall listen, for I am compassionate. (22:25,26)

Rarely do we find the Torah explaining the reason behind a mitzvah so thoroughly as it does in this case. Theoretically, the Torah is presenting an argument for returning the borrower’s garment before nightfall. Indeed, the Torah goes so far as to give three reasons for returning the garment: it is his only garment; “it covers his skin”; “in what shall he lie down?” One would expect the rav who was making an appeal on behalf of the less fortunate members of his community to emphasize these points. This, however, is not the Torah’s way. It presents the law without…

Continue Reading

ויבא משה ויספר לעם את כל דברי ד' ואת כל המשפטים. ויען כל העם קול אחד ויאמרו כל הדברים אשר דבר ד' נעשה

Moshe came and told the people all the words of Hashem and all the ordinances, and the entire people responded with one voice and they said, “All the words that Hashem has spoken, we will do.” (24:3)

Accepting the Torah was not a simple undertaking for the Jewish People. Here was a people that had previously been living in a country whose citizens were infamous for their profligate decadence; they had been slaves to masters who had redefined the meaning of cruelty; these were a people who were quite distant from religion of any kind, let alone ready to accept a Torah which would totally transform their lives. Yet, when the Torah was offered to them, they accepted it with a resounding declaration of Naase v’nishma, “We will do and we will listen.” What motivated their acceptance?…

Continue Reading

ויאמר ד' אל משה עלה אלי ההרה... ואתנה לך את לחת האבן והתורה והמצוה. ויקם משה ויהושע משרתו

Hashem said to Moshe, “Ascend to Me to the mountain… and I shall give you the stone Tablets and the teaching and the commandment… Moshe stood up with Yehoshua, his servant. (24:12,13)

Hashem instructed Moshe Rabbeinu to ascend the mountain, so that He could teach him the Torah and give him the Luchos. Moshe left together with Yehoshua, his trusted servant. What was Yehoshua doing there? He was not asked to attend – nor did he have any function at the mountain. This “party” was for Moshe alone. Rashi explains that Yehoshua accompanied Moshe out of a sense of loyalty. He waited for forty days at the foot of the mountain for his revered Rebbe to return. Chazal teach us that it was this fidelity to his Rebbe that earned Yehoshua the…

Continue Reading

ואלה המשפטים אשר תשים לפניהם

And these are the judgments that you shall place before them. (21:1)

Rashi teaches that Hashem told Moshe Rabbeinu, “It should not occur to you to say, ‘I shall teach them the chapter and the law two or three times, until it is set in order in their mouths according to its format (i.e. until they memorize it), but I shall not trouble myself to make them understand the reasons of the matter and its explanation.’ Therefore it says, ‘that you shall place it before them – like a table that is set and prepared to be eaten from, placed before a person.’ In other words, there is no room for error…

Continue Reading

ואם אמור יאמר העבד אהבתי את אדני...לא אצא חפשי והגישו אדניו אל האלקים והגישו אל הדלת או אל המזוזה ורצע אדניו את אזנו במרצע ועבדו לעולם

But if the bondsman shall say, “I love my master… I shall not go free… then his master shall bring him to the court and shall bring him to the door or to the door post, and his master shall bore through his ear with the awl, and he shall serve him forever. (21:5,6)

The Torah takes a dim view of an eved Ivri, Hebrew bondsman’s, desire to continue his servitude. His ear is bored with an awl as he stands near the doorpost. Why the ear? The ear (together with the rest of the body) stood at Har Sinai and heard Hashem declare, “Lo signov, Do not steal.” Yet, the man went ahead and stole. He had a list of excuses to justify his behavior. But, at the end of the day, he was a ganov, thief, and must pay for his actions. He had no money – otherwise, why would he steal?…

Continue Reading

והגישו אדניו אל האלקים...ורצע אדניו את אזנו במרצע ועבדו לעלם

Then his master shall bring him to the court… and his master shall bore through his ear with the awl, and he shall serve him forever. (21:6)

Rashi interprets Elokim as bais din, the Jewish court of law. Why would the court be compared to the Almighty to the point that they carry his Name? While there is no doubt that the members of the court are distinguished scholars, men of repute and distinction, but referring to them with G-d’s Name seems to be carrying their distinction a bit too far. Horav Gamliel Rabinowitz, Shlita, views this from a practical standpoint. An individual stands before the Bais Din and presents his claim in a clear manner. He lays out the proof, clears up any ambiguity that might…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!