Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Naso ->


“And it came to pass on the day that Moshe had completed setting up the Mishkan.” (7:1)

Chazal call attention to the first word of this pasuk hvhu, “and it came to pass.” They say that whenever this word occurs in Tanach, it always refers to a tzarah, a period of sorrow and grief. They question the element of grief associated with the Mishkan. The creation of the Mishkan as a place for the Shechinah to repose should surely be cause for simcha, happiness, and rejoicing. What role do despair and anxiety have during a moment of such exaltation? Chazal present an analogy to a king who had a quarrelsome wife, who would not stop her bickering….

Continue Reading

“Speak unto Aharon and unto his sons saying, so you shall bless the Bnei Yisrael.” (6:23)

Hashem commands that His blessing be conferred only by the kohanim. Horav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, suggests a practical reason for this. Regrettably, many people posit that the kohen and his present day counterpart, the Torah scholar are supported by the community without any reciprocation. Many individuals believe that if an individual is not “working” in the way that they are, he is not contributing to the community. This notion is, of course, categorically wrong.  The sustaining power of Klal Yisrael is manifest only through Torah and Torah scholars who devote their lives to its study and dissemination. This also applies…

Continue Reading

“Anything in which grapes have been seeped he shall not drink.” (6:3)

The Torah forbids the nazir to drink any intoxicating liquor or any beverage derived from grapes, even if it contains no alcohol. He may not even eat fresh or dried grapes. The prohibition includes water in which grapes had been briefly soaked, even if only a mere hint of the grapes had been present in the water. Chazal infer from this concept that the taste of a food is regarded as representative  of  the  food  itself,  or the taste is like the substance. In the Talmud Nazir 37b, Chazal also derive from this pasuk that when a half-measure of permitted…

Continue Reading

“Command the Bnei Yisrael that they send out of the camp every leper, and every zav, and whosoever is unclean by a (dead) person.” (5:2)

Horav Zalmen Sorotzkin z.l. offers a homiletic exposition of this pasuk. Many observant Jews ignore their co-religionists whom they notice acting in an offensive manner. When they see members of their community transgressing the Torah by desecrating Shabbos, eating non-kosher food, and acting reprehensibly, they delegate to the Rabbi the responsibility to chastise the offenders. These individuals refuse to get involved, claiming various lame excuses to justify their apathy to the public travesty against Hashem.  They feel that by sharing the details of their friends’ miscreancy with the Rabbi, they have fulfilled their requirements as Jews. Thus, they consider themselves…

Continue Reading

“And the charge of Elazar the son of Aharon the kohen shall be the oil for the light, and the sweet incense, the meal offering and the annointing oil, the oversight of the Mishkan and all of that is in it, as to the sanctuary and as to its vessels.” (4:16)

At the end of the parsha, the Torah records in minute detail the various functions delegated to Bnei Levi.  Each member of the tribe was given specific tasks to execute. Most notable is the multi-faceted charge allocated to Elazar.  He was assigned the position of Nasi, prince, of the leviim.  He also undertook to carry the vessels mentioned in the above pasuk. Chazal question Elazar’s ability to carry everything himself. Indeed, it seems logistically impossible to perform all of these duties at once. The Midrash explains that he carried the oil in his right hand, the incense in his left,…

Continue Reading

“And these (are) the generations of Aharon and Moshe… and these (are) the names of the sons of Aharon.” (3:1,2)

In response to this pasuk, Rashi cites the Talmud in Sanhedrin 19b.  Although the Torah mentions Aharon and Moshe’s generations, it goes on to enumerate only Aharon’s children.  Chazal derive from this pasuk that the scripture considers an individual who teaches his neighbor’s son Torah as if he has actually begotten the child. The Talmud in Sanhedrin 99b offers a slight variation to this statement. Chazal view the Rebbe as the one who fashioned the child. Is there a difference between uskh, begotten, and uvag, fashioned or made him? Each in their own distinct manner, the commentaries cite differences between…

Continue Reading

“Every man with his own camp and every man with his own flag.” (1:52)

The inclination to be orderly is an essential prerequisite for achieving shleimus, completion, in character development. One who is generally lethargic in his attitude and thoughtless in executing his responsibilities is often a confused person.  Such an individual is frequently unreliable and inconsiderate. It is vital for an individual to have a systematized approach to planning out his daily endeavor, so that he can set priorities and act upon them accordingly. Horav Simcha Zissel M’Kelm z.l. cites several sources from Chazal to illustrate this point. The heads of the yeshivos in Bavel were crowned with the title of “reish sidrah”…

Continue Reading

“Take the sum of all the congregation of Bnei Yisrael by their families, by their father’s households… from twenty years and upward.” (1:2,3)

In Jewish life, as well as in contemporary society, the family unit constitutes the most basic social unit.  The center of Jewish life always has been — and will always be — the home.  The home is the place in which parents prepare their children physically, emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually to serve Hashem in the Jewish way. The collapse of traditional Judaism in America has followed the breakdown of the Jewish home as it has functioned for thousands of years. The secularization of the Jewish family, effected by assimilation into American society, was the precursor of the spiritual decline of…

Continue Reading

“You shall not subjugate him with rigor and you shall fear your G-d… but over your brethren, Bnei Yisrael, one over another, you shall not rule with rigor.” (25:45,46)

The second admonishment against treating slaves harshly seems redundant. Why was it necessary to repeat the same prohibition three pesukim later? The Chasid Yaavetz explains that since the Torah had previously stated that we may enslave the Canaanites, a distinct possibility exists that we may inadvertently begin to treat the Jewish slave like his Canaanite counterpart. The Torah, therefore, repeats its warning against mistreatment of the Jewish slave. This statement is vexing. Are we to believe that one would unjustly mistreat a Jewish servant, because he is permitted to treat a Canaanite slave as he wishes? How does the treatment…

Continue Reading

“If your brother becomes impoverished… you shall strengthen him. Do not take from him interest and increase.” (25:35,36)

The prohibition against paying interest to a Jew presents a number of difficulties. First, why should interest be forbidden altogether? Second, if taking interest is so bad, why are we permitted to exact interest from gentiles?  Isn’t this a form of “double standard”? In response to these questions, Horav S.R. Hirsch z.l. offers an explanation which focuses on the true meaning of this prohibition. It is an accepted norm for one to make use of his home, animals, and various other possessions. He can do this either by personally utilizing them or by renting them out, applying the rental money…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!