Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Yisro ->


Yisro said, “Blessed is Hashem Who has rescued you from the hand of Egypt and from the hand of Pharaoh.” (18:10)

Yisro offers praise to Hashem for Klal Yisrael’s good fortune in being rescued from near destruction.  The Mechilta views this statement as a critique of Klal Yisrael,  saying that  Yisro was the first to praise Hashem with the words, “Baruch Hashem.”  We must endeavor to understand what was inappropriate about Klal Yisrael’s previous expressions of praise.  Did the Shirah that they sang at the Yam Suf constitute a less appropriate praise to Hashem than the words, “Baruch Hashem”?  Shirah is communal praise, employed when the congregation assembles to express  gratitude to the Almighty in unison.  Baruch Hashem is a personal…

Continue Reading

Yisro rejoiced over all the good that Hashem had done for Yisrael, that He had rescued it from the hands of Egypt. (18:9)

The word “oso,” which usually means, “him,” is translated as “it,” referring to Klal Yisrael.  Yisro rejoiced over the nation’s good fortune in being rescued from the dread hand of Pharaoh.  The Maharil Diskin, zl, takes a novel approach towards explaining the word “oso,” which implies a timely lesson for us.  He suggests that Yisro was,  in fact,  referring to himself.  He realized that Hashem had actually also saved him from the same fate suffered by the Egyptians.  Yisro remembered quite well that he was one of Pharaoh’s advisors.  When the issue of the Jewish problem arose, Yisro had the…

Continue Reading

Yisro, the father-in-law of Moshe, took Tzipporah, the wife of Moshe, after she had been sent away. (18:2)

When Moshe took his family with him to Egypt, it was Aharon who felt that they belonged back in Midyan in a safe, secure environment.  Enough people were suffering in Egypt.  Why add more people to the list?  Yisro was now bringing his daughter and grandsons to reunite them with their father.  Why does the Torah refer to Tzipporah as “the wife of Moshe”?  Since she was traveling with her father, the Torah should have referred to her as “his (Yisro’s) daughter.”  Horav Elchanan Sorotzkin, zl, comments that Tzipporah is referred to as Moshe’s wife for a  specific reason.  Parashas…

Continue Reading

Yisro heard…everything that G-d did to Moshe and to Yisrael, His People, that Hashem had taken Yisrael out of Egypt. (18:1)

The Torah records the various events that Bnei Yisrael experienced from the time that  they left Egypt until  they accepted the Torah.  Parashas Yisro is juxtaposed upon  the chapter that recounts the giving of the Torah.  Chazal dispute precisely  when Yisro joined the Jews.  Some commentators believe  that he arrived prior to the giving of the Torah.  Others claim that Yisro came after the Torah had been given.  We may question the position of Parashas Yisro according to those who contend that Yisro came after Matan Torah.  Why does the Torah record his arrival prior to Matan Torah if, in…

Continue Reading

And Timna was a concubine to Elifaz, son of Eisav, and she bore Amalek to Elifaz. (36:12)

Rashi cites the Talmud Sanhedrin 99b which explains the Torah’s emphasis on Timna.  Avraham Avinu was held in such esteem that people were eager to associate in any way with his descendants.  Timna was the daughter of nobility; yet when she came to Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov to convert, she was not accepted.  Since she was so anxious to marry a descendent of Avraham, she said to Elifaz, Eisav’s son, “If I may not become your wife, at least let me be your concubine.”  This union produced our  archenemy–Amalek.  The commentators are all troubled by the Patriarchs’ reaction to Timna’s…

Continue Reading

Their flocks, their cattle, their donkeys, whatever was in the town and whatever was in the field, they took. (34:28)

The behavior of Bnei Yaakov begs explanation.  Why did  they take the cattle and sheep?  Let us conjecture that they were justified in killing Shechem and Chamor for their immoral treatment of Dinah. Perhaps they were compelled to kill the men of Shechem for fear that they would seek vengeance. What, however,  would justify pillaging their livestock?  This act would cause people to think that their motivation for killing was really not sincere. Horav Elchanan Sorotzkin, zl, feels that Bnei Yaakov’s actions regarding the livestock communicates a significant message regarding the underlying reason for Shechem and Chamor’s original offer to…

Continue Reading

And Yaakov was greatly afraid and was distressed. (32:8)

When Yaakov heard that Eisav was coming towards him with an army of four hundred men, he was filled with anxiety and fear.  Why?  What caused Yaakov to be overcome with fear?  Did not Hashem assure him that He would be with him and protect him?  Did Yaakov not have faith in the Almighty?  Rashi explains that Yaakov’s fear resulted from an overriding concern that he had sinned, thereby causing Hashem to rescind His favor.  Twenty two years in the evil environment of Lavan affected him.   While it did not influence  Yaakov, he still feared that he was no…

Continue Reading

I sojourned with Lavan and have lingered until now. (32:5)

The numerical equivalent of “h,rd“, “garti” is 613, or dhr,, taryag, which is the number of mitzvos the Jew is commanded to observe.  Thus, the Midrash  interprets Yaakov’s words to mean, “Although I have sojourned with Lavan, I have observed the 613 mitzvos, and I have not learned from his evil ways.”  Yaakov was affirming his righteousness,  despite his exposure to  Eisav’s evil environment. We can derive an  important lesson  from this pasuk.  Yaakov Avinu stated emphatically that he had observed all 613 mitzvos.  Yet, he also asserts that he had not been influenced by Lavan’s evil ways.  Is it…

Continue Reading

When a ruler sins…unintentionally, and becomes guilty. (4:22)

Rashi notes that the pasuk which addresses the sin committed by the Nasi/leader of the people begins with the word “asher,” whereas the previous pesukim began with the word “im,” if.  He cites the Sifra that says that the word “asher” alludes to “ashrei,” fortunate.  This implies that a generation whose leadership is concerned and seeks atonement —  even for their unknown sins — is truly fortunate.  The Noam Elimelech gives insight into the “good fortune” of the generation whose leader atones for the sins.  A distance, an insurmountable breach, exists between the tzaddik, the righteous, pious man, and the…

Continue Reading

A soul that will offer a meal offering to Hashem. (2:1)

Rashi comments that the word “nefesh,” soul, is not mentioned in regard to any Korbanos Nedavah, free-willed offerings, except for a Korban Minchah, meal offering.  This is because usually the one who brings a meal offering is a poor man.  Hashem says that He considers the poor man’s offering as if he had offered his soul as a korban.  Simply put, this is because the poor man,  regardless of the minimal value of his offering, contributed relatively more than  his wealthy counterpart.  Consequently, his korban represents a more significant sacrifice. Horav Eliyahu Meir Bloch, zl, supplements this idea..  When the…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!