Sforno cites various differences that distinguished the Mishkan from its two successors, the Batei Mikdash. He posits that these differences ensured the Mishkan’s eternal viability, providing that it would never fall into the hands of enemies and be destroyed. First, the Mishkan contained the two Luchos: Second, it was initiated through Moshe Rabbeinu; Third, the avodah, service, was carried out through Isamar Hakohen and the Leviim. Fourth, the fact that Betzalel was the architect and builder of the Mishkan helped to guarantee its everlasting nature. Indeed, all those who occupied themselves with the building of the Mishkan were men of…
Back to Home -> 5758 ->
Chazal note that in many places in the Torah, Aharon’s name precedes that of Moshe. This implies that they were equally great men. We must address the concept of equivalent greatness between Moshe and Aharon. Moshe was unequivocally greater in nevuah, prophecy, as well as in other areas. Moshe was the select human being, the paragon of humanity, who was the unparalleled, quintessential leader of Bnei Yisrael. How could Aharon be viewed as equally great? Horav Moshe Feinstein, zl, posits that while, indeed, Aharon did not distinguish himself as much as Moshe, he did maximize his own potential. Hashem assesses…
Sforno takes a somewhat novel approach to explaining the four expressions of redemption which the Torah employs to describe the various stages of Yetzias Mitzrayim. The four leshonos shel geulah as interpreted by Sforno are: “h,tmuvu” “I will bring you out,” when the plagues begin the slavery will end; “h,kmvu”–“I will save you,” when you leave their borders; “h,ktdu”–“I will redeem you,” with the drowning of the Egyptians in the Red Sea. After the death of your oppressors, you will no longer be slaves; “h,jeku”, “I will take you unto Me as a nation,” at Har Sinai with the giving…
The Midrash recounts that Rabbi Yosi bar Chalafta was once questioned regarding what Hashem has been doing from the time that He created the world. In this purely rhetorical question, the Midrash seeks to understand the values on which Hashem places greatest emphasis. They respond that Hashem occupies Himself with zivugim, making couples, pairing off people and also material possessions. “This woman to that man, this money/material possession to that man” are the words used by Chazal. Upon consideration, Chazal seem to imply that one’s material success or lack therof is a zivug similar to finding a mate. As in…
For practical purposes, the Kohen who cleans the excess ash from the Altar changes his garments. He removes his regular vestments and changes into older, more worn priestly garments. A number of lessons can be derived from this concept. The most notable is that one should appreciate the significance of dressing properly for an occasion. When one greets the king he should prepare himself, donning garments which befit royalty. Hence, when one greets Shabbos, or enters a sancturary, such as a Shul, he should dress in clothes that are appropriate to the sanctity of the place and the holiness of…
Yaakov followed his parents’ instructions not to take a wife from the girls of Canaan. The Midrash refers to Yaakov as a chacham, wise man, because he listened to his parents’ advice. They cite a pasuk in Mishlei 12:14, “One who listens to advice is a chacham.” Let us analyze Yaakov’s remarkable wisdom. Eisav is waiting to kill him. His parents told him that his “bashert,” future wife, was waiting for him in Charan. He did not have many options. He had the choice to stay and be killed or to leave and meet his destined wife. Horav Baruch Mordechai…
Rashi explains that these garments were actually Eisav’s precious garments, which he had stolen from the great King Nimrod. Eisav, who was meticulous in the honor he bestowed on his father, always served Yitzchak while wearing these precious garments. Obviously Eisav’s attitude towards Kibbud Av, honoring his father; did not transform him into a moral human being. He continued in his evil ways, despite his meticulous performance of a single mitzvah. How are we to understand the paradox that was Eisav? How can someone who dons precious clothes to serve his father “moonlight” as a murderer? The commentators respond in…
Aharon was commanded to burn the Ketores at the same time that he cleaned the lamps of the Menorah. Is there some significance to performing these two seemingly unrelated aspects of the avodah together? Horav David Feinstein, Shlita, cites Chazal who say the burning of the Ketores atoned for the sin of lashon hora. The Menorah, on the other hand, was the symbol of limud ha’Torah. The Menorah is the remedy for the sin of lashon hora. One who studies Torah will invariably sanctify his entire body, including his power of speech. How can he use the mouth that studies…
This pasuk is a reference to the Choshen, Breastplate, which Aharon wore. The Choshen was folded in half to form a pocket into which was placed a parchment containing Hashem’s Ineffable Name. This was called the Urim V’Tumim. The Urim V’Tumim catalyzed the individual letters of the names of the shevatim which were inscribed on the Choshen to light up and give answers to questions of national importance. The zechus, merit, of wearing the Choshen was given to Aharon because of his special character. When he was coming to greet Moshe, after Moshe had been selected by Hashem to be…
One would expect that it would be incumbent upon every individual to participate in the building of the Mishkan. Yet, the Torah’s standard is to take donations only “from every man whose heart motivates him.” Regarding other mitzvos, the Torah places emphasis upon activity, the ma’aseh ha’mitzvah. Of prime importance regarding the building of the Mishkan is that the individual displays unequivocal ratzon, good will and desire to give. Imagine, had the people not exhibited pure ratzon to contribute towards the Mishkan, the Mishkan never would have been built! It behooves us to understand the significance of this willingness to…
