Attitude – Page 34 – Peninim on the Torah

“These are the words that Moshe spoke to all of Yisrael.” (1:1)

Speaking to Klal Yisrael, Moshe reproves them for their failings in the desert. Rashi cites the Sifri which explains that Moshe alluded to the various sins committed by Bnei Yisrael in veiled terms. He mentioned names of places which implied various transgressions on the part of Klal Yisrael. This approach preserved the dignity of Klal Yisrael. Even when rebuking someone, one must be sensitive not to unnecessarily embarrass the sinner. Rebuke can be made less humiliating by expressing it in subtle terms, when possible. We may wonder why Moshe spared no words in clearly outlining the sin of the meraglim,…

Home -> Matos -> 5754

Sruly Schnair In 5754, Matos

“And (there) were delivered out of the thousands of (Bnei) Yisrael, a thousand of every tribe, armed for war.” (31:5)

Rashi notes the word “they were delivered.” This seems to indicate that Bnei Yisrael were reluctant to wage war with Midyan, to the extent that Moshe literally was compelled to force them. Rashi explains that this episode demonstrates the love that Bnei Yisrael have for their leadership. Before Moshe’s impending demise was announced, Bnei Yisrael wanted to stone him. When they heard that his death was contingent upon their battle with Midyan, they refused to go to battle until they were delivered against their will. The Steipler Rav z.l. questioned Bnei Yisrael‘s apparent change in attitude towards Moshe. One moment…

Home -> 5754 -> Pinchas

Sruly Schnair In Pinchas, 5754

“Let Hashem set… a man over the congregation… who shall go out before them and who shall lead them out and who shall bring them in; that the congregation of Hashem (be not) as sheep which have no shepherd for them.” (27:16,17)

The commentators derive a variety of lessons from these pesukim concerning the Torah‘s concept of the consummate leader. What is the analogy between the relationship of a shepherd with his flock and a Torah leader’s relationship with Klal Yisrael? As he lay on his deathbed, the Ksav Sofer answered this question in the following manner. A shepherd will invariably lead his flock to places that have the best grazing, lush grass, cool waters and the finest climate. The shepherd does this in order to serve his personal interests. The sheep are his property. Their health and welfare represents money in…

Home -> 5754 -> Chukas

Sruly Schnair In Chukas, 5754

“And they wept for Aharon thirty days all the house of Yisrael.” (20:29)

Regarding Moshe’s death, in Sefer Devarim 34:8 the Torah states, “And Bnei Yisrael wept for Moshe.” It does not assert that “all the house of Yisrael wept,” as it says in response to Aharon’s death. Rashi explains that Aharon’s passing generated a greater outpour of grief among the people. Aharon was rodef shalom; he pursued peace. He constantly sought ways to bring peace among men of strife, as well as between husband and wife. His passing was, therefore, felt more strongly by the common Jew. The Ohr Ha’Chayim responds to this perplexity in a number of ways. After citing Rashi’s…

Home -> 5754 -> Chukas

Sruly Schnair In Chukas, 5754

“And the people dwelt in Kadesh, and Miriam died there and was buried there.” (20:1)

Rashi cites the Talmud in Moed Katan 28a which explains the juxtaposition of Miriam’s death upon the laws of parah-adumah. This combined message informs us that, just as korbanos effect atonement, so too, the death of tzaddikim effects atonement. This statement is perplexing. In Parashas Beshalach, Rashi asserts that the laws of parah- adumah were conveyed at Marah, or, at the latest, during Bnei Yisrael’s second year in the desert. Miriam’s death, however, took place during the fortieth year! If the actual span between these two incidents was so long, why then does the Torah link them? Second, according to…

Home -> 5754 -> Korach

Sruly Schnair In Korach, 5754

“And Korach took… and they all rose up in the face of Moshe and Aharon men of renown. And they assembled against Moshe and Aharon and said to them, ‘you take too much upon you… seeing that all the congregation is holy. And Hashem is in their midst, wherefore do you lift yourselves up above the congregation of Hashem?'” (16:1,2,3)

Korach’s criticism of Moshe seemed to be a reaction to Aharon’s assuming the role of Kohen Gadol. Thus, the two main personalities involved in this machlokes, strife, were Korach and Moshe. Korach was the classic scoundrel, evil throughout. An irate man may inflict damage upon an individual person, but others may nonetheless benignly attempt to understand the source of his anger and correct him. What makes a scoundrel such as Korach contemptible is his blatant hypocrisy. He hides his evil behind a sham of piety. He unabashedly claims noble motives for his despicable act. Indeed, he impudently attempts to enlist…

Home -> 5754 -> Shelach

Sruly Schnair In Shelach, 5754

“And they (the meraglim) spread an evil report of the land which they had spied out… the land through which we have passed to spy it out is a land that eats up its inhabitants.” (13:32)

Rashi explains the meaning of “a land which eats up its inhabitants.” Wherever the meraglim went, they found the inhabitants burying their dead. They did not realize, however, that this was part of Hashem’s plan to protect them. If the people were occupied with their mourning, they could pay no attention to the strangers. If so, did the meraglim really lie? They did not fabricate any reports which they did not actually witness. Indeed, they related to Moshe and Klal Yisrael only what they personally saw. Why, then, were they punished? The Kotzker Rebbe z.l. explains that “true” and “false”…

Home -> 5754 -> Beha'alosecha

Sruly Schnair In Beha'alosecha, 5754

“And the mixed multitude that was among them felt a lusting and then wept again also the Bnei Yisrael and they said, “who will give us meat?” and Moshe heard the people weeping in their families… and in the eyes of Moshe it was evil.” (11:4,10)

The narrative regarding the asafsuf is vexing. As mentioned previously, Bnei Yisrael lacked no food. Chazal teach that the manna, which descended daily, had an amazing quality. Its taste varied in accordance to each person’s desire. Indeed, each individual’s craving was satisfied. Nonetheless, Bnei Yisrael cried out for meat. Their ingratitude was magnified when they expressed their desire to return to the “wonderful” Egypt. Moshe’s response also seems atypical. When Bnei Yisrael sinned with the Golden Calf, Moshe entreated Hashem on their behalf. He exhausted every effort to save them from complete destruction. In this situation, Moshe “gave up” in…

Home -> 5754 -> Beha'alosecha

Sruly Schnair In Beha'alosecha, 5754

“And he (Moshe) said leave us not… and you shall be to us instead of eyes.” (10:31)

In one interpretation of this pasuk, Rashi explains that Moshe’s request of Yisro refers to the future. His request was that the people be able to approach Yisro for enlightenment concerning any concept which they could not understand. This seems perplexing! Considering all of the wise men and elders in Klal Yisrael, was there no one to whom the people could go for advice and instruction? Why was Yisro’s counsel determined to be the most prudent? Horav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, suggests that Yisro’s background as a baal–teshuva rendered his advice most propitious. One who has been nurtured from birth to…

Home -> 5754 -> Beha'alosecha

Sruly Schnair In Beha'alosecha, 5754

“And if you will come into war in your land against the enemy that oppresses you, then you shall blow an alarm with trumpets, and you shall be remembered before Hashem your G-d and you shall be saved from your enemies.” (10:9)

Discussing Klal Yisrael‘s entry into battle, in Parashas Ki Tzeitzei (Devarim 21:10), the Torah does not seem to outline any specific means of aggressive attack. The Torah simply states, “When you go forth to war against your enemies, and Hashem your G-d will deliver them into your hands.” Why is there such a disparity between the two parshios dealing with waging war on the enemy? The Kotzker Rebbe z.l. distinguishes between two contrasting types of war. He suggests that the term “war” is actually an allusion to man’s constant battle with the yetzer hora, evil inclination. The differential is determined…

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Back to Home -> 5754 ->

“These are the words that Moshe spoke to all of Yisrael.” (1:1)

“And (there) were delivered out of the thousands of (Bnei) Yisrael, a thousand of every tribe, armed for war.” (31:5)

“Let Hashem set… a man over the congregation… who shall go out before them and who shall lead them out and who shall bring them in; that the congregation of Hashem (be not) as sheep which have no shepherd for them.” (27:16,17)

“And they wept for Aharon thirty days all the house of Yisrael.” (20:29)

“And the people dwelt in Kadesh, and Miriam died there and was buried there.” (20:1)

“And they (the meraglim) spread an evil report of the land which they had spied out… the land through which we have passed to spy it out is a land that eats up its inhabitants.” (13:32)

“And the mixed multitude that was among them felt a lusting and then wept again also the Bnei Yisrael and they said, “who will give us meat?” and Moshe heard the people weeping in their families… and in the eyes of Moshe it was evil.” (11:4,10)

“And he (Moshe) said leave us not… and you shall be to us instead of eyes.” (10:31)

“And if you will come into war in your land against the enemy that oppresses you, then you shall blow an alarm with trumpets, and you shall be remembered before Hashem your G-d and you shall be saved from your enemies.” (10:9)

YEARS

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

You have Successfully Subscribed!