Three sins are mentioned: the Kohen Gadol sins; the Sanhedrin err in halachah; the Nasi or king sin. Regarding the first two sins, the Kohen Gadol and Sanhedrin, the Torah begins withthe word “im”, if (he/they sin). When the Nasi sins, the Torah writes “asher,” when (he sins). Why is there a change in the Torah’s wording regarding the Nasi? The Meshech Chochmah opines that the phrase, “asher nasi yecheta”, “when a Nasi/ruler sins”, is connected to the words that precede it, namely, “Chatas ha’kahal hu,” “it is a sin- offering of the congregation.” In other words, the ruler’s sin…
Back to Home -> 5760 ->
The Midrash notes the fact that Moshe Rabbeinu had as many as ten names, each one characterizing a different one of his traits. Hashem told him that regardless of his many names, He would refer to him only by the name that Bisya bas Pharaoh had given him – Moshe. Referring to drawing him from the water, “ki min hamayim meshisihu,” she called him Moshe, which is related to “meshisihu,” “drew him” (from the water). While this name is important, it only reflects Bisya’s act of saving him, so it should not take precedence over the other names that address…
Horav Ovadiah Yosef, Shlita, cites a powerful analogy to give a profound meaning to this pasuk. A man once entered a department store and requested that the salesperson show him their best mirror. The salesperson returned with a very impressive mirror. The customer took one look at it, frowned and returned it saying this is not what he wants. The salesperson queried, “What is wrong with this mirror that you rejected it so fast?” The would-be customer responded, “I see a strange image in this mirror.” Upon hearing this, the salesperson took one look at the man standing before him: …
Rashi notes the use of the word “nefesh,” soul, in reference to the Korban Minchah. Indeed, the Torah uses this word only in regard to the Korban Minchah. A meal-offering is the most inexpensive of all korbanos. It is the korban of choice for the poor man who seeks to donate whatever he can put together as a korban. Hashem recognizes the source of this korban – the nefesh – of the person who gave so much of himself, because he had nothing else to give. The “azkarah,” remembrance — which consists of the scoop of the offering — is…
The Torah arranged the various korbanos according to individual transgression, distinguishing also between the offering brought by the rich man and his poor counterpart. The commentators delve into the hidden rationale behind the korbanos and their relationship to the various sins for which they atone. In his exposition on korbanos, The Sefer Ha’chinuch makes a compelling statement. He writes that the concept of korbanos, of slaughtering and offering an animal upon the mizbayach, should invoke and inspire within us a more profound understanding of the nature of a human being. Essentially, man and animal has much in common – physically. …
The Ramban notes that regarding the Kohen Gadol’s transgression, the Torah does not end the process of korban and atonement with the phrase, “And he shall provide him atonement for his sin, and it shall be forgiven him.” Regarding the Kohen Hedyot, common Kohen, Nasi, ruler, or entire kahal, community, the Torah does use this phrase. He explains that, indeed, the Kohen Gadol, who provides the standard for spiritual dimension in Klal Yisrael, cannot receive atonement just by bringing a korban. No; he needs more than the average Jew. He must implore Hashem to forgive him; he must pray fervently…
The Yalkut comments that actually Moshe had been given ten names, each expressing a different attribute. Yet, Hashem called him by one name–Moshe. The Almighty chose the name that was given to Moshe by Bisyah bas Pharaoh, which refers to her drawing him from the water: “ki min ha’mayim meshisihu,” “for I have drawn him from the water.” This became the name by which Klal Yisrael’s quintessential leader, the Almighty’s eved ne’eman–faithful servant, was to be called. Why? Was there no other name that described Moshe’s character, devotion, self-sacrifice, leadership ability, teaching skills, etc.? Also, the name “Moshe” does not…
Rashi explains the Torah’s emphasis upon the word “adam”, man, as an allusion to Adam Ha’Rishon. His korban did not have a tinge of impropriety connected to it, since everything belonged to him. So, too, may we not offer any korbanos from that which is not rightfully ours. We may question the Torah’s choice of word–adam–as the point of reference for teaching us that we may not use that which is stolen. Throughout the Torah, we derive the prohibition from using that which is gezel, stolen, from the word “la’chem,” yours. That which we use for a mitzvah must belong…
Rashi comments that the word “nefesh,” soul, is not mentioned in regard to any Korbanos Nedavah, free-willed offerings, except for a Korban Minchah, meal offering. This is because usually the one who brings a meal offering is a poor man. Hashem says that He considers the poor man’s offering as if he had offered his soul as a korban. Simply put, this is because the poor man, regardless of the minimal value of his offering, contributed relatively more than his wealthy counterpart. Consequently, his korban represents a more significant sacrifice. Horav Eliyahu Meir Bloch, zl, supplements this idea.. When the…
Rashi notes that the pasuk which addresses the sin committed by the Nasi/leader of the people begins with the word “asher,” whereas the previous pesukim began with the word “im,” if. He cites the Sifra that says that the word “asher” alludes to “ashrei,” fortunate. This implies that a generation whose leadership is concerned and seeks atonement — even for their unknown sins — is truly fortunate. The Noam Elimelech gives insight into the “good fortune” of the generation whose leader atones for the sins. A distance, an insurmountable breach, exists between the tzaddik, the righteous, pious man, and the…
