Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Korach -> 5757


On the next morning…and behold the staff of Aharon had blossomed it brought forth a blossom, sprouted a bud and almonds ripened. (17:23)

Finally, the people were privy to clear, unequivocal truth – Aharon was Hashem’s choice for Kohen Gadol.  Alas, the miracle of Aharon’s staff occurred after Korach and his followers met their terrible end — and over fourteen thousand Jews perished in a plague.  Would it not have been more advantageous that the miracle of Aharon’s selection take place in the presence of his detractors, so that they could witness the truth?  Perhaps it would have inspired them to repent.  Such action might have circumvented the ensuing tragedy. Obviously, proof would have had little or no effect upon Korach and his…

Continue Reading

And the earth opened up its mouth and it swallowed them…and all the men that belonged to Korach. (16:32)

All those who joined Korach in his conflict met their end tragically.  Korach’s sons, however, did not die. As Sforno comments,  “They were not drawn after him in the matter.”  It seems strange that such a charismatic demagogue as Korach had no permanent influence upon his children.  Chazal assert that Korach was  imbued with the ability to see the future. Therefore, he  was secure in his success,  since he foresaw his noble descendants.  Ostensibly, Korach’s ability was limited.  He saw the tzaddikim that would be his progeny, but he did not see his own disaster.  In any event, what happened…

Continue Reading

And Korach gathered the entire assembly. (16:19)

Korach is recorded in history as the archetype of the baal machlokes, one who generates strife and contention.  We may wonder what distinguished Korach in this area.  After all, he was not the first person in the Torah who was involved in strife.  Did not Kayin fight with his brother?  And the list goes on from there. We suggest that while Korach was not the first person to argue with others, he was the first to start a movement founded in contention, whose goal was to usurp the leadership of Klal Yisrael.  It is one thing to disagree, even to…

Continue Reading

And he (Moshe) said to Hashem; Do not turn to their offering. I have not taken one donkey from them, neither have I hurt them. (16:15)

Moshe, acting atypically, implored Hashem not to accept any form of offering whereby Korach and his henchmen could expiate their sin of rebellion.  Sforno interprets Moshe Rabeinu’s demand in the following manner.  Had they sinned against Hashem, then He would have pardoned them after they had atoned for their actions.  Sins committed against one’s fellow man are not atoned even on Yom Kippur, unless the sinner has appeased the one whom he has wronged.  Moshe disclaims receiving any benefit from them.  Thus, his leadership over them was entirely for their benefit, to attend to their affairs and needs.  Their criticism…

Continue Reading

And Korach ben Yitzhar ben Kehas ben Levi separated himself. (16:1)

Korach was not simply another hatemonger  who sought to usurp Moshe and Aharon as a result of intense feelings of  envy.  Korach was among those who “carried” the Aron Ha’kodesh.  He was obviously sensitive to the fact that the Aron was in reality carrying those who attempted to carry it.  It would be unrealistic to think that an individual who was so aware of Hashem should stoop to such machlokes, controversy,  unless something “noble” motivated him. The Kotzker Rebbe, zl, explains that Korach sought Kehunah,  He felt that he could serve Hashem better if he were a Kohen.  His complete…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!