The Chofetz Chaim, z.l., explains that the moment when Moshe stood before Bnei Yisrael, prepared to bring them into Hashem’s covenant, was filled with trepidation and uncertainty. On the one hand, Moshe had shared with Bnei Yisrael Hashem’s recognition of their lofty accomplishments. His statement of unconditional love for them reassured them of their future. Immediately thereafter, however, Moshe admonished them regarding the individual Jew who might have been leaning towards idol worship. This individual’s deviation from Hashem could fester, bringing ruin to a whole nation! This seems unreal! How could an entire community fall victim to the folly of…
Back to Home -> Nitzavim ->
The Ramban explains that the individual whose slight deviation will eventually grow into blatant evil is at present a pious Jew. He stands in seeming direct contradistinction to the full-fledged believer in paganism. Nonetheless, the Torah combines the two into one group. Indeed, their only point of divergence is intellectual belief. To the unknowing onlooker, they may appear to be two very different people. One is an obvious heretic, while the other acts like he should be grouped with the devout. The Torah says, however, that appearances are deceiving. The two individuals act distinctly, but their heresy is essentially similar….
Moshe’s farewell address to Bnei Yisrael seems enigmatic. Why does Moshe mention his advanced age and “frailty” in his closing words? Horav Chaim Sheinberg, Shlita, cites the Sforno who adds insight to Moshe’s words, “I am a hundred and twenty years old this day.” Do not grieve over my death, for according to nature I should not be alive until today. “I can no longer go out and come in.” And even if I were to live, I would not be able to go out and come in on your behalf because of my advanced age. “And Hashem has told…
Rashi explains that, although the little children were clearly not capable of comprehending the experience, they accompanied the adults. Thus, those who brought them would be rewarded. In truth, the children that came along probably disrupted the adults to the point that they could not listen as intently as they would have desired. We may, therefore, wonder at the Torah’s insistence that the children be present. Would it not have been preferable for the children to remain at home, in order to enable the adults to properly concentrate on their avodas Hashem, service to Hashem? Horav N. Adler, z.l., suggests…
According to the Masoretic tradition, the letter “lamed” of the word ofkahu (and He threw them out) appears enlarged. The commentators offer various reasons for this custom. Horav Dovid Feinstein, Shlita, offers an insightful homiletic interpretation. The name of the letter “lamed” implies the concept of teaching. He suggests that the purpose of Hashem’s exile of the Jews was not merely to punish them, but rather to teach them the ramifications of straying from the Torah. This is consistent with the principles of effective punishment by which one receives instruction in the consequences of his sins. When one realizes the…
The Ramban states that the Torah is describing the foundation and essence of “teshuva” (repentance) in this pasuk. Indeed, the entire chapter deals with this critical mitzvah. Horav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, explains the notion of “returning” to Hashem in the following manner: Man does not sin unless a foolish idea, which is antithetical to Torah philosophy, enters his mind. This idea festers within him, causing him to gradually separate himself from Hashem. A man who cogently reflects upon Hashem’s constant proximity to him never consciously sins. He is capable of sinning only after a subconscious feeling of remoteness has…
Horav Shmelka of Nikelsburg Z”l offers an insightful interpretation for the word and “He will have compassion upon you” in the context of the pasuk. One who shows compassion in his relationship with people has undoubtedly repented his past sins, for transgressions create an attitude of cruelty towards others within an individual. Consequently, the Torah states that after one has repented, you will notice a compassionate nature about him. The character traits of a Jew are directly influenced by his spiritual attitude. Although he may superficially exhibit tendencies of compassion and decency, these are only facades which are not inherently…
The word used by the Torah h,,bu – “I have set before you” to describe the two divergent paths which stand before every Jew seems puzzling. This word appears to be appropriate only to the context of blessing, as it shares a root with the word vb,n (present). Why, then, does the Torah use the same verb to apply to a curse, as well? The Shelah Hakadosh extends this question to include the idea of freedom of decision. When one is confronted with two reads, one leading to success, riches, and fame, and the other leading to trials, pain, and…
It is puzzling to find these distances expressed as such extremes. Why are we told that it is not in heaven nor beyond the sea, but actually it is to be found within us? It should be sufficient to state simply that this mitzvah is not beyond our reach. This statement is, however, far from extreme, and conveys a basic truth. Man is composed of two contrasting entities, the physical and spiritual. He has the ability to soar to the most sublime spiritual heights, or to sink to the nadir of decadence and depravity. Indeed the range of man’s perception…
The Torah clearly equates good and blessing with life, and evil and curses with death. It therefore seems peculiar that the Torah enjoins us to “choose life” with its various fringe benefits as opposed to selecting evil and curses which are compared to death. If this mandate is stated to a G-d fearing and morally upright Jew then the enjoinment to “choose life” is hardly necessary. It is unnecessary to convey this message to a non-believer, for he evidently does not embrace this positive definition of life. We also wonder at the posuk’s sequel, “so that you shall live, you…
