We note that Hashem promises His blessing only after Bnei Yisrael will ask the question, “What will we eat?” This is an unrealistic approach. Why would Hashem not ordain His blessing regardless of whether or not the people were anxious about their sustenance? Do those who observe his mitzvos without question deserve to go hungry? Horav Moshe Feinstein, zl, offers a practical answer. If Bnei Yisrael had not asked this question, Hashem would have granted an even greater miracle. Indeed, He would have ordained that the initial output of the sixth year would suffice for three years. Since…
Back to Home -> 5758 ->
Rashi says, do not wait until he has fallen and must be picked up. It is difficult to raise up someone who is down — completely. Rather, one should support him, trying to catch him when he is faltering. Give him sustenance; lend him a helping hand, give him the courage to continue. Horav E. M. Shach, Shlita, comments that chesed, kindness, begins with understanding and forethought. We should look around and study the plight of those around us, and with an intelligent eye try to see what it is our friend needs and how we can be of assistance. …
The prohibition against paying or receiving interest is beyond comprehension. Why should it be forbidden? If it is normal for one to make use of his tools, his animals and his home, why can he not make use of his money? Logically speaking, “renting out” money should be no different than renting out a house. Moreover, interest should be the logical payment to one who has lent his own money to someone who was unable to use his money. Also, if interest is forbidden, why is it permissible to receive interest from a non-Jew? If it is wrong, it is…
This pasuk implies that the blessing will be apparent during the sixth year. Sforno comments that the blessing of prosperity prior to the Shmittah year will be to such an extent that it will ease even the mind of the skeptic. The Yalkut Shemoni cites the pasuk in Tehillim 103:20 which states, “Bless Hashem, O His Angels, the strong warriors who do His bidding, to obey the Voice of His Word.” Rabbi Yitzchak Nafcha says that the words “angels and strong warriors” refer to those who observe Shmittah. The individual sees his fields and vineyards lie fallow, and he accepts…
The words “u,t” and “ung” are usually translated as “with you.” While most translators attribute these two distinct words the same meaning, there is a difference between the two. If we were to say that someone took along a certain object and placed it in his suitcase, we would say that he took it “u,t” – with him. The object, while it is with him, is not part of the individual; he just carries it along. If however, we wanted to say that an individual took something along in his mind, he remembered something, we would say “ung”. It becomes…
One would think that he who helps sustain the poor is to be commended. In fact he is. The poor man who is the object of his beneficence should also be commended for availing the benefactor an opportunity to give. Yet, Chazal say, “Greater is what the baal habayis does for the ani, than is what the ani does for the baal habayis.” What does this mean? Horav Eliyahu Meir Bloch, zl, explains that when we examine closely the middah of chesed of Avraham Avinu, the pillar of kindness, we note a concept of chesed that is not congruent…
The Navi Yecheskel says (18:13) “(If he) Gives (loans) with usury and takes interest should he live? He shall not live!” Regarding this pasuk the Midrash comments, “The Almighty says, “He who has lived/sustained himself with usury in this world, will not live in the World to Come.” Simply, the individual who does not have the sensitivity and human decency to provide his fellow man with a loan without squeezing interest from him will not merit the Olam Habah reserved for every Jew. There is a famous incident that occurred with Rav Akiva Eiger, zl, which underscores this statement. In…
The Torah admonishes us not to take undue advantage of the eved Ivri, Hebrew slave. He is reprehensible to demand that he perform difficult tasks that have no purpose other than destroying his self-respect. Rashi cites two such instances that do nothing more than destroy the slave’s body and spirit: ordering him to boil water when there is no need for it; ordering him to keep digging around a tree for a long period of time for no apparent purpose. The Rambam says that it is prohibited to require the slave to work just to keep him busy. While the…
In the Talmud Avodah Zarah 62a, Chazal infer that we may eat that which grows during the Shemittah year. The produce, however, may not be bought and sold commercially. Chazal expound upon the stringency of the command prohibiting any form of commerce with the fruits of shviis, the seventh year. What is so unique about this prohibition is that there seems to be such an anathema about it? Indeed, Chazal teach us that one who buys or sells peiros sheviis will ultimately lose all of his possessions. He will be compelled to beg for his sustenance, to the point that…
What really is the question? Let us see the sixth year’s yield. If it is sufficient for three years, why is the individual questioning Hashem? If it is insufficient, what response are we giving to him? The commentators respond with various approaches to this obvious question. The Alter M’Novardek, zl, offers a powerful insight into the concept of bitachon, trust in the Almighty, which sheds light on the pesukim. The individual of no faith does not wait until the sixth year to question Hashem. He does not wait patiently until the last minute, anticipating a cure, a livelihood, an answer…