The Midrash questions Moshe’s choice of the word morning, instead of the more usual, tomorrow. They comment that Moshe told Korach, “Hashem sets boundaries in this world which you can not undo. As Hashem has separated day from night, so has He separated Bnei Yisrael from the gentile nations. Similarly, He has separated Aharon from His people. When you will be able to reverse the distinction set by Hashem between day and night, then you will also be able to reverse the separation between Aharon and the rest of Bnei Yisrael. In this vein, referring to the pasuk, and it…
Back to Home -> Korach ->
Korach’s criticism of Moshe seemed to be a reaction to Aharon’s assuming the role of Kohen Gadol. Thus, the two main personalities involved in this machlokes, strife, were Korach and Moshe. Korach was the classic scoundrel, evil throughout. An irate man may inflict damage upon an individual person, but others may nonetheless benignly attempt to understand the source of his anger and correct him. What makes a scoundrel such as Korach contemptible is his blatant hypocrisy. He hides his evil behind a sham of piety. He unabashedly claims noble motives for his despicable act. Indeed, he impudently attempts to enlist…
Rashi cites the Talmud Bava Metzia 61b which suggests a reason that the Torah mentions the exodus from Egypt in conjunction with the mitzvah of tzitzis. During makas bechoros, smiting of the first born, Hashem distinguished between he who was actually a first born and he who was not. Similarly, in the future He will exact retribution from one who places a kala ilan, an indigo dyed wool in his garment and says that it is techeles, blue wool. This seems difficult to grasp. Who is the individual trying to deceive? Is he attempting to mislead the public? Do people…
Rashi explains that the Torah is relating Bnei Yisrael’s shame. They had observed the first Shabbos in the desert, and on the second Shabbos an individual profaned it. Why were Bnei Yisrael held responsible for this isolated act of chillul Shabbos? Indeed, they had done everything possible to ensure that the sanctity of Shabbos not be desecrated. The Sifri states that Moshe had even designated guards throughout the encampment to caution people regarding chillul Shabbos. When the people saw this man pick up the sticks, they admonished him not to continue his desecration of Shabbos. When he ignored their warning,…
After having witnessed the great miracles which were evident both in Egypt and in their journey throughout the desert, it seems incredible that Bnei Yisrael would so quickly regress back to rebellion. This was no ordinary group of people; they were distinguished leaders who had in the past exhibited exemplary faith in the Almighty. Horav Moshe Feinstein z.l. implies that emunah, belief, founded solely on miraculous revelation, which is devoid of intellectual appreciation, will not endure. One can not attain the maximum level of faith in Hashem impetuously. One is obligated to carefully plan and pursue a diligent step-by-step program…
Rashi explains the meaning of “a land which eats up its inhabitants.” Wherever the meraglim went, they found the inhabitants burying their dead. They did not realize, however, that this was part of Hashem’s plan to protect them. If the people were occupied with their mourning, they could pay no attention to the strangers. If so, did the meraglim really lie? They did not fabricate any reports which they did not actually witness. Indeed, they related to Moshe and Klal Yisrael only what they personally saw. Why, then, were they punished? The Kotzker Rebbe z.l. explains that “true” and “false”…
Rashi explains the concept of .g, wood, as a metaphor for an adam kasher, an honorable, virtuous man, whose merit will protect the pagans. This explanation however, does not seem to fit into the sequence of the pasuk. What is the meaning of “and bring of the fruit of the land”? What relationship is there between the “fruit of the land,” “its trees, and an “adam kasher“? The Satmar Rebbe z.l. suggests the following explanation. It is difficult to ascertain the authenticity of an individual’s virtue. It is possible to “put on a show” superficially, displaying oneself as honorable and…
Why was Miriam punished specifically with tzaraas, leprosy? Is there a definite relationship between her punishment and her sin? Horav Boruch Sorotzkin z.l. offers a profound response, based upon a novel interpretation of the meaning of sin and its effect. Sin can be viewed from two distinct perspectives. Fist, sin is a transgression of the Divine imperative. When the king issues an edict, one is obligated to adhere to it to the fullest extent. No excuses compensate for such an infraction. Second, sin may be compared to a disease. Just as there are physical ailments and disease, so, too, are…
The narrative regarding the asafsuf is vexing. As mentioned previously, Bnei Yisrael lacked no food. Chazal teach that the manna, which descended daily, had an amazing quality. Its taste varied in accordance to each person’s desire. Indeed, each individual’s craving was satisfied. Nonetheless, Bnei Yisrael cried out for meat. Their ingratitude was magnified when they expressed their desire to return to the “wonderful” Egypt. Moshe’s response also seems atypical. When Bnei Yisrael sinned with the Golden Calf, Moshe entreated Hashem on their behalf. He exhausted every effort to save them from complete destruction. In this situation, Moshe “gave up” in…
In one interpretation of this pasuk, Rashi explains that Moshe’s request of Yisro refers to the future. His request was that the people be able to approach Yisro for enlightenment concerning any concept which they could not understand. This seems perplexing! Considering all of the wise men and elders in Klal Yisrael, was there no one to whom the people could go for advice and instruction? Why was Yisro’s counsel determined to be the most prudent? Horav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, suggests that Yisro’s background as a baal–teshuva rendered his advice most propitious. One who has been nurtured from birth to…