Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Vayeitzei ->


“And I will return to my father’s home in peace; there Hashem will be my G-d.” (28:21)

Rashi interprets this pasuk in the sense that Yaakov Avinu was concerned that there should be no blemish on his descendants. Yaakov did not want to be saved from death at the hands of his brother, Eisav, only to have his offspring doomed to assimilation. The Jew has always concerned himself with his children’s future. The “future” to which Yaakov was referring was his children’s spiritual future. He certainly was anxious regarding their physical and financial security, but that was not his prime concern. The security of financial success was secondary to the Patriarch who was to build Klal Yisrael….

Continue Reading

“And in the morning, (he saw) she was Leah.” (29:25)

At night Yaakov was not aware that it was Leah with whom he had been united in marriage. Indeed, as Rashi comments, Yaakov had prearranged signals with Rachel for their wedding night. When Rachel saw, however, that Leah was being substituted for her, she told her sister the signs – out of concern for Leah’s potential humiliation. Rachel’s supreme act of abrogation is considered of such import that it serves as eternal merit for her descendants. Chazal relate that when the first Bais Ha’Mikdash was destroyed and the Jewish people were taken into captivity, the Patriarchs and Moshe intervened from…

Continue Reading

“And he (Yaakov) also loved Rachel, more than Leah.” (29:30)

Horav S.R. Hirsch, zl, notes the significance of the fact that Klal Yisrael was uniquely formed from two mothers who differed as much in character as in appearance. Leah was the one who felt herself placed somewhat in the background. Yet, she was chosen by Hashem to be the principal ancestress of His people. Her hope was to succeed in receiving mutual love from her husband, by virtue of being the requiem wife and mother. Always happy, she calmly accepted the vicissitudes of life’s challenges. With every child, she hoped to add to the foundation of love, admiration and respect…

Continue Reading

“And she conceived again and bore a son and she said ‘This time I thank Hahsem,’ therefore she called his name Yehudah.” (29:35)

The Talmud Brachos 7b comments that from the beginning of Creation there had never been a person who thanked Hashem until Leah. Leah was the originator of the “official” sense of gratitude one should express for the good Hahsem accords us. This does not seem consistent with the text in Parashas Chayei Sarah (4:52), where we note that upon securing Rivkah as a mate for Yitzchak, Eliezer bowed down in recognition to Hashem for providing Rivkah for Yitzchak. Why do Chazal attribute the distinction to Leah of being the first to offer gratitude? Horav Meir Bergman, Shlita, distinguishes between bowing…

Continue Reading

“And he took from the stones of the place.” (28:11)

The Midrash comments that Yaakov took twelve stones, symbolizing the nation that he would soon establish. The twelve stones represented the twelve tribes which were to coalesce into a unified nation.  Yaakov said, “I knew that a great nation would be established. Avraham did not establish it and neither did my father, Yitzchak. If these twelve stones meld together to become one, then it is a sign that I will be the one who will establish this great nation.” Yaakov Avinu’s simile is enigmatic. If one person, Yaakov, were to establish a nation via the birth of twelve tribes, then…

Continue Reading

“And He called the name of that place Bais El.” (28:19)

The name Bais El means “the house of G-d.”  It was the m’kom Ha’Mikdash, the designated place for the Bais Ha’Mikdash. The Midrash notes the disparity between the way each one of the Avos, Patriarchs, expressed themselves in regard to this special “place”. Avraham Avinu referred to it as the “Har,” mountain; Yitzchak Avinu referred to it as Sadeh, field, while Yaakov referred to it as “Bais,” house. What perspective regarding this holy center and its function is reflected by these disparate terms? Horav Mordechai Ilan, z.l., suggests two approaches towards understanding these metaphors.  In his first explanation, he focuses…

Continue Reading

“Then Yaakov took a vow, saying, ‘If Hashem will be with me, and guard me on this path…'” (28:20)

Yaakov seems to be asking Hashem for something that Hashem had already granted him.  Hashem had previously told Yaakov, “I will not forsake you.” What compelled Yaakov to question his future relationship with Hashem? Horav Nissan Ha’Meiri, Shlita, suggests that Yaakov was asking that Hashem grant him and his descendents the resolve to maintain perspective of the true source of blessing. Regrettably, when one falls on “tough” times, he tends to blame his lamentable state upon Hashem.  When the situation changes and he is blessed with success, he attributes this newfound good fortune to his own wisdom and capabilities. In…

Continue Reading

“She said, ‘Here is my maid Bilhah, live with her, so that she may bear upon my knees and I too may be built up through her.” (30:3)

The precedent for Rochel giving her maidservant, Bilhah, to Yaakov for the specific purpose of having a child was set by Sarah Imeinu, who gave Hagar to Avraham. We must endeavor to understand what there is about transferring one’s maidservant to her husband for the purpose of childbearing that increases one’s “chances” of being blessed with a child. Horav Meir Bergman, Shlita, responds by first citing a Midrash, which recounts the dialogue between Michal bas Shaul and David Ha’melech. Michal criticized David Ha’melech for the manner in which he expressed his joy when the Aron Ha’Kodesh was brought through the…

Continue Reading

“And Yaakov went out from Be’er Sheva and (he) went toward Charan.” (28:10)

Rashi states that it was not necessary for the Torah to mention Yaakov’s departure. It would have been quite sufficient to state his intended destination. The Torah is emphasizing an important point – that the departure of a tzaddik, righteous person, makes an impression upon the entire community. During the time that a tzaddik resides in a city/community, he constitutes its glory, its splendor and its crown. When he departs, however, these noble attributes are sorely lacking in the community.  Consequently, his departure creates a significant void in the community. Many lessons can be derived from Rashi regarding the character…

Continue Reading

“And Yaakov went out from Be’er Sheva and (he) went toward Charan.” (28:10)

Rashi notes the Torah‘s emphasis upon Yaakov’s departure. He explains that a tzaddik’s departure from a community creates a noticeable impact, for he is the glory, splendor and crown of a community.  We may wonder why the Torah chooses to emphasize the tzaddik’s positive influence upon a community only after he has left. Doesn’t his stay within the community also create its glory and splendor? Responding to this question, Horav Elchanan Sorotzkin z.l. opines that the Torah is regrettably alluding to the obvious; it is only when a tzaddik leaves the community that people appreciate his contribution. On the contrary,…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!