Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> Metzora ->


“And there shall be taken for the person being purified two birds.” (14:4)

Horav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, observes that there are two types of baalei lashon hara, slanderers. There are those who are blatant, who disparage without shame. Their lack of sensitivity for others is overshadowed only by their own personal lack of self-respect. There is yet another type of baal lashon hara: one who attempts to veil his invidious activities, because he is embarrassed by his reprehensible maligning of others. He seeks to hurt; he has no qualms whatsoever about character assassination, but he doesn’t want to have his own name revealed as the cause of this embarrassment. The Torah addresses itself…

Continue Reading

“And he shall take one bird… and he shall send away the living bird.” (14:5,7)

This is one of two instances in the Torah in which two animals are selected: Both times, one serves as a korban, while the other is sent away to the desert. The first selection, which occurs on Yom Kippur, is carried out through the use of lots. The goat whose lot is marked L’Hashem is used as a korban, while the goat whose lot is marked L’Azazel is sent into the desolate desert to die. Why is there no lottery used in this case to select which bird will live and which bird will die as a korban ? It…

Continue Reading

“The one to whom the house belongs shall come and declare to the kohen, saying, ‘Something like an affliction has appeared to me in the house.'” (14:35)

It is interesting to note that when the Torah refers to someone who has an affliction on his body, it says, ivfv kt tcuvu, “He shall be brought to the kohen (14:2). In contrast, in regard to a plague afflicting a house it says here “He shall come to the kohen.”  What reason is there for this disparity between the two plagues ?  Horav Dovid Feinstein, Shlita, makes a noteworthy observation. The plagues which strike one’s body, clothes, or home are an indication from Above that something is wrong with this person. The affliction progresses from the individual to his…

Continue Reading

“And Hashem spoke to Moshe and Aharon saying: Speak to the Bnei Yisrael and say to them, any man who will have a discharge from his flesh … is contaminated.” (15:1,2)

In this pasuk, the Torah uses the word urcs in the plural form. In contrast, the Baal Ha’Turim notes that regarding the laws of negaim, plagues, the Torah does not use the word, urcs in the plural form. The distinction implies that Aharon was excluded from transmitting the laws of negaim to Bnei Yisrael.  He asserts that Aharon’s involvement in the sin of the Golden Calf precluded his ability to teach the laws of negaim since the Golden Calf was the precursor of the negaim which were to strike Bnei Yisrael as punishment for their treasonous worship. This explanation is…

Continue Reading

And the one to whom the house belongs shall come, and he shall tell the Kohen saying, something like a plague had appeared to me in the house. (14:35)

The Torah relates a form of disease which can afflict the Jewish home. The Torah refers to this disease as tzara’as, a sort of spiritual leprosy within the walls of the house. The Torah details specific instructions for the Kohen and the owner of the house regarding the procedure for dealing with this “affliction”. Chazal emphasize the Torah’s choice of the word in the house. Indeed, as they note, “tumah is declared only if the rot appears inside the house.” One’s internal life is expected to be in order. The hypocrisy to which children are sensitive must not exist. There…

Continue Reading

And you shall separate Bnei Yisrael from their contamination. (15:31)

The word o,rzvu, you shall separate, from contamination is derived from the word rzb, crown. The crown distinguishes its wearer from the masses. The Sfas Emes explains, that similarly, Bnei Yisrael distinguish themselves by separating from the moral contaminants which abound. It is the true hallmark of Bnei Yisrael’s majesty that they rise above earthly contamination in order to devote themselves to serving Hashem. Those who dedicate their lives to this endeavor are truly worthy of Hashem’s crown.

Continue Reading

“And the Kohen shall command to take for him that is to be cleansed… And cedar wood, and scarlet, and hyssop.” (14:4)

The leper who had prepared to be cleansed was to bring cedar wood, a symbol of might and strength, together with a hyssop, which represents the opposite. Why should his offering reflect these two contradictory characteristics? Horav Moshe Shternbuch Shlit”a suggests the following message may be derived from this pasuk. These plagues were visited on a person as a punishment for various spiritual offenses. One of these sins was “jurv ,uxdw” which can be defined as arrogance and haughtiness. This trait often translates itself into vulgarity, indicating lack of spiritual refinement and sensitivity which should be the hallmark of a…

Continue Reading

“And the Kohen shall command and take for him that is to be cleansed two living pure birds… And the Kohen should command to slaughter one of the birds.” (14:4-5)

Rashi explains that these plagues are the result of evil talk, specifically the act of babbling words. Consequently, birds, which babble continually with chirping sounds, were required for true purification. The leper’s thoughtless chatter resulted in this plague. We may wonder at the necessity of using two birds. This message could be derived from one bird, as well. It seems similarly peculiar that only one bird was slaughtered, while the other was set free.   Apirion on the Torah explains that in order to answer these questions, we must first reflect upon the reasons for offering these sacrifices. The commentaries…

Continue Reading

“When you shall come to the land of Canaan which I give to you as a possession, and I put the plague in a house of the land of your possession. And he that owns the house shall come and tell the Kohen saying, “It appears to me that something like a plague is in the house.” (14:35-36)

Chazal cite one form of social functioning to be especially responsible for causing plagues of the house. This trait is selfishness, which is manifest by one excluding himself from performing neighborly kindness. Chazal emphasize the words, “he that owns the house,” to mean, “who keeps his house exclusively to himself.” Such an individual applies the principle of Sodom. This principal distorts the incisive principle of property right saying, “What I have is mine, what you have is yours”. He seems to forget that the inclusiveness of love must be added to the exclusiveness of property rights. He doesn’t recognize that…

Continue Reading

“And I put the plague in a house of the land of your possession… And the Kohen will come and see that the plague has spread throughout the house… Then he shall demolish the house, its stones and its wood.” (14:34,44-45)

Rashi quotes the Medrash which states that a plague of leprosy on the house was a blessing in disguise. Upon hearing about the eventual entry of Bnei Yisrael into their land, the Cananites hid their valuables in the walls of their houses. Thus, they sought to prevent their valuables from falling into Jewish hands. In order that these treasures would be discovered by His people, Hashem caused a leprous plague to appear on the house. The houses would then have to be demolished, thereby exposing the hidden treasures. This seems a rather indirect way of giving riches to people. Why…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!