The Ramban notes the fact that when the Torah recounts Klal Yisrael’s iniquities, it mentions the conflict in which Dasan and Aviram participated. It does not, however, mention the leader of the conflict, Korach. He explains that Korach transgressed in an invidious manner, by offering a strange fire for the ketores. This precluded his name from being “remembered” in the Torah. The Ramban’s words lend profound insight into the character of those whose names are mentioned in the Torah. It also indicates that mention in the Torah — even as a scoundrel — is still viewed as meritorious. Horav Chaim…
Back to Home -> Eikev ->
If one were to translate this pasuk literally it would read, “If you listen gna ot, then ugna,, you will listen.” This interpretation communicates a different message which has great meaning. First, we must begin to listen, the rest will come later. One who refrains from beginning to listen obviously cannot continue listening. A specific process guides mitzvah observance. We must take the first step and then build upon the foundation which we have created. All too often, people become overwhelmed by the magnitude of Torah and mitzvos. They are confounded by their inability to grasp the entire storehouse of…
The parsha concludes with a last exhortation to be diligent in keeping mitzvos. Indeed, the entire parsha seems to focus upon mitzvah observance. This prompts Chazal to comment, vcrv ch,f ohruna . The word rna, “to keep,” is repeated a number of times in this parsha. Why is this issue reiterated? Chazal respond with a thoughtful remark, “Perhaps you might say, ‘there are elders among us, there are great men among us, there are prophets among us, so what is there for us to keep’.” The Torah responds, iurna, runa , “You must also keep…
This pasuk implies that Bircas Ha’mazon is not merely a formal offering of gratitude for the meal which we have eaten. Rather, it proclaims our acknowledgment that Hashem is the source of all things. Indeed, we even submit our thanks to Hashem for providing us with our land. This seems enigmatic. Imagine being invited to someone’s home for dinner and, after the meal, thanking the host for the use of his furniture and home during the course of the meal. This expression of gratitude is undoubtedly excessive. Why, then, is it necessary to specifically mention the land during Bircas Ha’Mazon?…
Horav E. Dessler, z.l., explains that all which comprises an individual’s creative personality, including his capacity to earn a livelihood, his intelligence, foresight, business acumen, and skill, are the products of Hashem’s beneficence. In fact, every facet of one’s existence is derived from Hashem. The miracle of physical and mental health is not the direct result of the nutrition inherent in the food we eat. Rather, Hashem employs the food as a vehicle by which He imparts this seemingly natural blessing. Horav Dessler cites Targum Onkelos, who explains that the thought process which catalyzes every endeavor is actually the work…
Rashi explains that ushnavk, “to destroy him,” refers to the destruction of children. During the sin of the Golden Calf, Hashem dictated that Aharon was to be punished by the death of his children. Only through Moshe’s entreaty on his behalf were two of his sons spared, although two did die. The Mizrachi derives from Rashi’s statement that Nadav and Avihu died as a result of Aharon’s involvement in the Golden Calf. This idea, however, is inconsistent with Rashi in Shemos 24, where he states that they died as a result of beholding the glory of Hashem while they were…
The Ramban suggests that Har Ha’Har, upon which Aharon died, was actually a mountain ridge stretching from Mosera to Kadesh. Aharon climbed up to the ridge in Kadesh and died on top opposite Mt. Mosera. This explanation resolves the apparent contradiction concerning the place of Aharon’s demise, Mosera or Har Ha’Har. Horav Yekusiel Grunwald, z.l., offers a homiletic rendering of this pasuk which suggests a profound message. Mosera was the place where brother fought against brother with casualties falling on each side. After Aharon’s death, the Clouds of Glory departed, causing much consternation among Bnei Yisrael. Afraid of war…
It is not sufficient to study Torah. An individual must constantly review his Torah studies, so that they remain in his mind and becoame integrated into his personality. Indeed, the Sifri ascribes to this pasuk the admonition to repeat again and again that which we have learned. The Torah warns that, just as one has to be careful not to lose any penny that he has earned, he should likewise vigilantly guard against losing any Torah knowledge which he has acquired. In Iyov 28:7, Torah knowledge is compared to both gold and glass. Like gold, it is difficult to acquire,…
As Bnei Yisrael neared the culmination of their forty year trek in the desert, Moshe warned them of the pitfalls that might accompany their successful entry into Eretz Yisrael. As they forged their way, conquering the seven nations whose might was to prove no match for the Divinely ordained army of Bnei Yisrael, they might fall prey to pride and haughtiness. They might even begin to believe that their own military prowess enabled them to defeat their enemies. They might forget that it was Hashem who had promised them that these events would occur and that it was only through…
A number of questions concerning the text of this pasuk are appropriate. First, Bnei Yisrael did not travel from Beeros to Moserah. On the contrary, Moserah preceded Beeros in their list of encampments. Rashi cites the Midrash which explains that this was actually part of Moshe’s rebuke to Bnei Yisrael. Aharon’s death at Har Hahar effected the departure of the clouds of glory, which had previously protected them in the desert. This change caused great consternation among many of the people. In the ensuing confusion, the people attempted to return to Egypt. After traveling back eight encampments to Moserah they…