Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

And On ben Peles. (16:1)

Download PDF

On Ben Peles almost joined  Korach’s misguided group.  His wife  saved him.  The word “On” is related to “onen“, a mourner.  Chazal tell us that he was called On because he spent the rest of his life in aninus, mourning, over the error that nearly cost him his life.  Interestingly, Korach’s sons also repented.  Why were they not called On for their act of repentance?  Was their remorse different from that of On?

Horav Zeev Weinberger, Shlita, comments that while both On and Bnei Korach showed remorse, Bnei Korach acted upon their remorse.   They resolved to change in  the future.  They did not remain “in mourning,” feeling sorry for themselves, regretting  the past, but refusing to address  the future.

What a profound thought!  How many of us regret our error, show remorse over our sins, even become depressed for awhile over our misdeeds, but do not progress from this point?   That is all we do.  For some,  depression becomes an end in itself, rather than being part of the process of growth. Remorse is an essential prerequisite for teshuvah but it does not comprise the sole contributing factor.  One must proceed  to triumph over remorse, to overcome the vicissitude of depression,  and to accept the challenge of spiritual advancement. Korach’s sons did.  On, on  the other hand, was too preoccupied with the past to confront the future.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!