Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Yosef named his firstborn Menashe, for G-d has made me forget all my hardship,…and the name of the second son he called Efraim, for G-d has made me fruitful in the land of my suffering. (41:51,52)

Download PDF

Horav Zeev Weinberger, Shlita, asserts that Yosef purposely gave his sons specific names.    In naming Menashe,  he was determined first to focus on removing the “past.” With Efraim’s name, he intended to offer  gratitude for the present. We note that  Yosef is the only tribe for whom two reasons are given for his name.  Rachel says, “G-d has taken away my disgrace” and “May Hashem add for me another son.”    Once again, the twin concepts of erasing the past and maintaning a positive attitude about  the present are manifest in these two names.  This implies that  Yosef’s personality consists of  two overt forces which were transmitted to his descendants via the two tribes that descended from him.

These two forces represent two concepts which have been the subject of dispute:  “sur meira,” turn away from evil; and “asei tov“, perform good deeds. Which is more important? On which idea should greater focus be placed? Can one perform mitzvos if  he has not yet eradicated the evil within him?  Should one wait to perform mitzvos until after he has purged himself of all evil?  Menashe and Efraim symbolize these two distinct concepts.  Menashe’s name emphasizes total elimination of past evil, while Efraim’s name alludes to focusing on constructive future activity, particularly mitzvos.  Yosef and Yaakov differed  regarding the relative significance of these concepts.  Yaakov sought to bless Efraim prior to Menashe, an action  which Yosef could  not understand.  He felt that we must first expunge evil before we can proceed to perform good deeds.  Yaakov’s experience in life taught him to be flexible.  One cannot totally rid oneself of all evil without developing the capacity to  “do good.”

In their classic dispute regarding the neiros, lights of Chanukah, Bais Shammai and Bais Hillel also debate this issue.  The light of the candle creates  two forces:  the power to burn; and the power to give off light.  The Chashmonaim triumphed over the Greeks, destroying their evil.  They came to the Bais Hamikdash to purify it of its tumah, spiritual contamination. They lit a jar of untainted oil, which they discovered.  This oil miraculously lasted for eight days.  We can view the light/fire of Chanukah from two perspectives.  It is a flame that burns and destroys evil.  This is symbolized by Bais Shammai’s approach, pocheis v’holeich, decreasing in number each night.  According to Bais Shammai, on the first night we should light eight candles.  On each subsequent night, we should subtract one light, signifying the destruction of evil.   Bais Hillel, on the other hand, holds that one must first be kum v’asai, take a positive approach, purifying oneself through serving the Almighty and performing His mitzvos.  This avodah, service, will succeed in eradicating evil, according to Bais Hillel.  Thus, they contend that one should be moseif v’holech, increase a candle each night, starting with one candle and adding an additional candle  each night as the force of purity becomes stronger and brighter.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!