Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

Category

Back to Home -> 5754 ->


“When a ruler sins.” (4:22)

Rashi cites the Sifri which translates the word rat, when, as implying hrat, fortunate and praised. This refers to a generation whose ruler directs himself to bring an atonement for a sin committed in error. How much more so when he repents of his deliberate sins!  Why should the entire generation be credited for having a penitent leader? What role does the community play in its leader’s desire to publicly seek atonement for his transgressions? Horav Moshe Shternbuch, Shlita, cites Rav Yisrael Salanter z.l. who explained this Chazal in the following manner. Some communal leaders do not follow in the…

Continue Reading

“And He called unto Moshe.” (1:1)

The Midrash states that Moshe was actually known by ten different names, each describing a different aspect of his multi-faceted personality. Each name depicted a specific trait not implied by the others. Of all the names mentioned, however, the name Moshe, given to him by Bisya, the daughter of Pharaoh, was the one by which Hashem addressed him. A name is an appellation which characterizes a person’s personality, a single word which uniquely encapsulates an individual’s entire essence. We must, therefore, endeavor to understand why Hashem selected the name Moshe to reign supreme over all the other names. Indeed, the…

Continue Reading

“And He called unto Moshe, and Hashem spoke to him out of the Ohel Moed.”

Rashi explains that this “voice” ceased at the boundaries of the Ohel Moed. He adds that this was not because the voice was weak, since it was an amazingly powerful sound. Hashem intercepted this sound so that it would not be heard outside of the Ohel Moed. Why did Hashem create such a powerful voice only to miraculously disrupt its emanation? Horav Y. Neiman, z.l., offers a profound insight into this matter. This voice was not miraculously intercepted, rather, one is required to be within the confines of the Ohel Moed in order to hear the voice of Hashem. The…

Continue Reading

“If a man among you desires to bring a sacrifice near to Hashem, from the cattle, from the herd, and from the flock shall you bring near your sacrifice.”

In the Midrash, Chazal explain the Torah’s choice of the word “ost” rather than “aht”. They state that one’s korban must be similar to that of iuatrv ost. As he was the rightful owner of his possessions, his sacrifice was pure and untainted by the stigma of theft. We, too, must take care not to offer a sacrifice which is taken from anything which was unlawfully acquired. This statement is problematic. Obviously, Chazal do not use the word “theft” in the usual sense of the word. This meaning could have been derived from the last word of the verse, “your…

Continue Reading

“If any one shall sin through error from all of the mitzvos of Hashem that they not be done.” (4:2)

This pasuk seems enigmatic! This individual transgressed only one sin. Yet, the Torah views this infraction as if he had transgressed numerous sins! Horav Nissan Alpert, z.l., suggests the following approaches to this question. One who has attained spiritual nobility, even one who has reached the acme of Kehunah, priesthood, the Kohen Gadol, is still vulnerable to spiritual transgressions. Such an individual who sins, even in error, reflects that he is yet lacking in spiritual perfection. He is deficient in performing all the mitzvos of Hashem. During his moment of spiritual decline, he indicates that he is capable of sinking…

Continue Reading

“And He called unto Moshe.”(1:1)

It has long been a Jewish tradition to begin a child’s Chumash education with Parshas Vayikra. The Yalkut Yehudah maintains that this custom is based upon the essence of this parsha. The korbanos, the focus of this parsha, represent sublime purity. Similarly, young children are pure and innocent of all sin. Let those who are pure involve themselves in Torah study through this parsha, which deals with man’s pure activity and duty – sacrifices to Hashem.   The Avnei Azel employs the theme of sacrifice to address a parent’s necessary attitude towards Jewish education. In order to properly inculcate Torah…

Continue Reading

“And He called unto Moshe and He spoke to him.” (1:1)

The Medrash makes a powerful statement regarding the importance of a Torah scholar’s ethical character. It states that “any Torah scholar who does not possess daas (knowledge, wisdom, understanding), is no better than a dead animal.” The fact that Moshe refrained from entering the Mishkan until Hashem called him to enter reinforces this concept. The Midrash seems to equate derech eretz and ethical character with wisdom and understanding. What relationship is there between morality and wisdom? Second, why should the humility which pervaded Moshe’s character serve as the paradigm for all people? Obviously, Moshe’s relationship to Hashem was neither casual…

Continue Reading

“If a man from among you would bring an offering near to Hashem.” (1:2)

Rashi explains that this posuk refers to voluntary korbanos There are Mitzvos which man has been given a choice of whether or not to observe included in the 613 mitzvos . Their observance affirms man’s relationship to Hashem. We find that the call to bring materials for the building of the Mishkan was addressed to those who would “donate from the heart.” Some korbanos, as mentioned above, were non-obligatory. This concept similarly applies to mitzvos which apply to areas of chesed (kindness). The minimums performances are stated, while the actual amounts are exclusively man’s decision. Why is this so? If…

Continue Reading

“If a man from among you would bring an offering near to Hashem.” (1:2)

It is difficult to define the word “icre” in order to adequately express the underlying concepts. The unfortunate use of the term “sacrifice” implies giving up something which is of value to one individual or the benefit of another or of living without something of value. Rabbi Shamshon Raphael Hirsch Z”l remarks that these ideas are not only absent from the nature of a korban, but they are diametrically opposed to it. Likewise, the definition “offering,” does not really define this word. The idea of an offering suggests that it fulfills a requirement mandated by the One to Whom this…

Continue Reading

“If any man of you would bring an offering… you shall bring your offering.” (1:2)

The posuk begins with the singular “chreh” and finishes with the plural “uchre,.” What is the reason for this change in the posuk? When man sins, he believes that his transgression affects only himself. This is not true. An individual’s sin affects the whole group. The Midrash compares the concept of individual sin to one who is aboard a ship and begins to make a hole in its bottom. When the other members of the ship’s group chastise him, he remarks that he is only making the hole in his portion of the ship. He either doesn’t realize or perhaps…

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our weekly Peninim on the Torah list!

You have Successfully Subscribed!